mishahaynie
Joined Jun 2017
Welcome to the new profile
We're making some updates, and some features will be temporarily unavailable while we enhance your experience. The previous version will not be accessible after 7/14. Stay tuned for the upcoming relaunch.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews87
mishahaynie's rating
F1 isn't just a movie-it's a full-throttle experience that blows past every expectation and redefines what a modern racing film can be. It might be the insane realism captured from actual Formula One tracks, or it might just be Brad Pitt's deathly handsome good looks and undeniable charisma-but whatever it is, F1 is the adrenaline shot the summer box office desperately needed.
This high-octane Apple Original Films production is revving with power both behind and in front of the camera. Produced by blockbuster maestro Jerry Bruckheimer-who's never met a spectacle he couldn't turn into a crowd-puller-F1 is reportedly made on a budget around $200 million, with some insiders whispering it could've reached as high as $300 million. And guess what? It's already zoomed past the checkered flag with a massive $140 million global opening weekend. That's not just momentum-that's cinematic velocity.
Brad Pitt stars as a veteran driver returning to the grid, and from the moment he appears onscreen, he owns the track. But he's not racing alone. Javier Bardem brings his signature gravitas to the role of a wily team owner, while rising star Damson Idris turns in a breakout performance that practically hums with electricity. Together, this trio transforms the story into something far deeper than a simple comeback tale-it's about legacy, risk, trust, and the raw edge of competition.
As a longtime fan of racing films, I walked into F1 cautiously optimistic, hoping it could live up to the legacy of John Frankenheimer's Grand Prix (1967)-a film still revered for its groundbreaking race sequences. Frankenheimer also gave us the jaw-dropping car chases of Ronin (1998) and the underrated French Connection II (1975). To my surprise and delight, F1 doesn't just match Frankenheimer's legacy-it may actually surpass it.
Director Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick) brings a modern precision to the chaos of F1 racing. He told the F1 Explains podcast how the custom car for Pitt was developed with input from none other than Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff and seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton-who also serves as a producer on the film. Their fingerprints are all over the authenticity of this project.
Kosinski's mastery behind the camera is on full display. With the use of GoPro tech, track-mounted cameras, and some of the most inventive race cinematography I've ever seen, he puts you right in the cockpit with Pitt. You don't just watch the action-you feel it. The screech of the tires, the vibration of the engine, the breath between turns-it's all captured with jaw-dropping clarity. This isn't just high-definition; it's high emotion.
F1 isn't just for racing fans-it's a must-see for anyone who appreciates bold filmmaking, sharp performances, and storytelling that never lets up on the gas. It's fast. It's loud. It's stylish. And best of all, it's got heart.
F1 is a modern marvel of action cinema. If Grand Prix invented the car racing movie, F1 just perfected it.
🏁 Buckle up.
This high-octane Apple Original Films production is revving with power both behind and in front of the camera. Produced by blockbuster maestro Jerry Bruckheimer-who's never met a spectacle he couldn't turn into a crowd-puller-F1 is reportedly made on a budget around $200 million, with some insiders whispering it could've reached as high as $300 million. And guess what? It's already zoomed past the checkered flag with a massive $140 million global opening weekend. That's not just momentum-that's cinematic velocity.
Brad Pitt stars as a veteran driver returning to the grid, and from the moment he appears onscreen, he owns the track. But he's not racing alone. Javier Bardem brings his signature gravitas to the role of a wily team owner, while rising star Damson Idris turns in a breakout performance that practically hums with electricity. Together, this trio transforms the story into something far deeper than a simple comeback tale-it's about legacy, risk, trust, and the raw edge of competition.
As a longtime fan of racing films, I walked into F1 cautiously optimistic, hoping it could live up to the legacy of John Frankenheimer's Grand Prix (1967)-a film still revered for its groundbreaking race sequences. Frankenheimer also gave us the jaw-dropping car chases of Ronin (1998) and the underrated French Connection II (1975). To my surprise and delight, F1 doesn't just match Frankenheimer's legacy-it may actually surpass it.
Director Joseph Kosinski (Top Gun: Maverick) brings a modern precision to the chaos of F1 racing. He told the F1 Explains podcast how the custom car for Pitt was developed with input from none other than Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff and seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton-who also serves as a producer on the film. Their fingerprints are all over the authenticity of this project.
Kosinski's mastery behind the camera is on full display. With the use of GoPro tech, track-mounted cameras, and some of the most inventive race cinematography I've ever seen, he puts you right in the cockpit with Pitt. You don't just watch the action-you feel it. The screech of the tires, the vibration of the engine, the breath between turns-it's all captured with jaw-dropping clarity. This isn't just high-definition; it's high emotion.
F1 isn't just for racing fans-it's a must-see for anyone who appreciates bold filmmaking, sharp performances, and storytelling that never lets up on the gas. It's fast. It's loud. It's stylish. And best of all, it's got heart.
F1 is a modern marvel of action cinema. If Grand Prix invented the car racing movie, F1 just perfected it.
🏁 Buckle up.
A24 Studios, known for their bold and boundary-pushing storytelling, has released one of its most visceral and uncompromising films to date with Warfare (2025). Written and directed by Ray Mendoza and Alex Garland, this war drama is based on Mendoza's real-life experiences as a U. S. Navy SEAL during the Iraq War. Specifically, it recounts a harrowing encounter on November 19, 2006, following the Battle of Ramadi, in unflinching real-time detail.
What sets Warfare apart from other war films is its commitment to authenticity. The dialogue, pacing, and events are all drawn directly from testimonies of Mendoza's own platoon. This isn't a dramatization of war-it's a reconstruction. There's no Hollywood polish here, and the film doesn't try to romanticize combat. Instead, it immerses you in the claustrophobic intensity of a single building where everything takes place, making the experience both powerful and at times, overwhelming.
And that's the catch. While the movie's realism is unmatched-truly the most accurate portrayal of war I've ever seen-it's also extremely bloody, loud, and emotionally draining. Some sequences are so intense they're almost nauseating, especially paired with the film's brutally effective sound design. The constant barrage of gunfire, shouted commands, and chaotic movement left me with a genuine migraine when I walked out of the theater. It's not for the faint of heart, and honestly, some scenes were difficult to sit through.
The emotional core of the film is dedicated to platoon member Elliott Miller (Jarvis), who suffered life-altering injuries in the real event. The movie handles his story with reverence and gravity, even including real footage of Miller and behind-the-scenes moments with the actors and soldiers. These glimpses into the real-life people behind the story anchor the film in humanity, offering a poignant reminder of the cost of war.
Still, Warfare isn't perfect. My biggest gripe is that, despite the emotional weight and realism, not much changes or develops over the course of the film. Its single-location setup adds to the realism, sure-but dramatically, it can feel stagnant. It's clear the filmmakers were more focused on honoring truth than crafting a traditional narrative arc, and while I respect that, it does make the film feel a little too contained and, at times, chaotic in its execution.
Overall, Warfare is a powerful, disturbing, and deeply personal film that prioritizes truth over entertainment. It may not be an easy watch-and frankly, it shouldn't be-but the heart behind it is undeniable.
What sets Warfare apart from other war films is its commitment to authenticity. The dialogue, pacing, and events are all drawn directly from testimonies of Mendoza's own platoon. This isn't a dramatization of war-it's a reconstruction. There's no Hollywood polish here, and the film doesn't try to romanticize combat. Instead, it immerses you in the claustrophobic intensity of a single building where everything takes place, making the experience both powerful and at times, overwhelming.
And that's the catch. While the movie's realism is unmatched-truly the most accurate portrayal of war I've ever seen-it's also extremely bloody, loud, and emotionally draining. Some sequences are so intense they're almost nauseating, especially paired with the film's brutally effective sound design. The constant barrage of gunfire, shouted commands, and chaotic movement left me with a genuine migraine when I walked out of the theater. It's not for the faint of heart, and honestly, some scenes were difficult to sit through.
The emotional core of the film is dedicated to platoon member Elliott Miller (Jarvis), who suffered life-altering injuries in the real event. The movie handles his story with reverence and gravity, even including real footage of Miller and behind-the-scenes moments with the actors and soldiers. These glimpses into the real-life people behind the story anchor the film in humanity, offering a poignant reminder of the cost of war.
Still, Warfare isn't perfect. My biggest gripe is that, despite the emotional weight and realism, not much changes or develops over the course of the film. Its single-location setup adds to the realism, sure-but dramatically, it can feel stagnant. It's clear the filmmakers were more focused on honoring truth than crafting a traditional narrative arc, and while I respect that, it does make the film feel a little too contained and, at times, chaotic in its execution.
Overall, Warfare is a powerful, disturbing, and deeply personal film that prioritizes truth over entertainment. It may not be an easy watch-and frankly, it shouldn't be-but the heart behind it is undeniable.
The Amateur is one of those rare thrillers that sneaks up on you. At first glance, you might not expect much-perhaps a decent storyline at best-but what unfolds is a surprisingly gripping and well-executed film that keeps you on edge from start to finish.
Directed by James Hawes, the film boasts striking cinematography that elevates the story well beyond expectations. Hawes brings a sharp eye for mood and tension, using lighting, framing, and pacing to craft an atmosphere that's as stylish as it is unsettling. Every visual choice feels purposeful, drawing the viewer deeper into the unfolding mystery.
The performances by Rami Malek and Laurence Fishburne are absolutely fantastic. Malek delivers his signature intensity with a nuanced vulnerability, making his character both relatable and unpredictable. Fishburne, as always, brings gravitas and quiet strength to the screen, anchoring every scene he's in with presence and authority. Together, the two create a dynamic that's both tense and layered, giving emotional depth to the suspense.
What really sets The Amateur apart is how tightly the suspense is woven. Just when you think you have it figured out, the story shifts-never with cheap tricks, but always with calculated precision. It's the kind of thriller that leans into psychological tension rather than bombastic action, and it pays off.
In short, The Amateur is a standout. With a smart, suspenseful script, excellent direction by James Hawes, and stellar performances by Rami Malek and Laurence Fishburne, it delivers far more than expected-and lingers with you long after the credits roll.
Directed by James Hawes, the film boasts striking cinematography that elevates the story well beyond expectations. Hawes brings a sharp eye for mood and tension, using lighting, framing, and pacing to craft an atmosphere that's as stylish as it is unsettling. Every visual choice feels purposeful, drawing the viewer deeper into the unfolding mystery.
The performances by Rami Malek and Laurence Fishburne are absolutely fantastic. Malek delivers his signature intensity with a nuanced vulnerability, making his character both relatable and unpredictable. Fishburne, as always, brings gravitas and quiet strength to the screen, anchoring every scene he's in with presence and authority. Together, the two create a dynamic that's both tense and layered, giving emotional depth to the suspense.
What really sets The Amateur apart is how tightly the suspense is woven. Just when you think you have it figured out, the story shifts-never with cheap tricks, but always with calculated precision. It's the kind of thriller that leans into psychological tension rather than bombastic action, and it pays off.
In short, The Amateur is a standout. With a smart, suspenseful script, excellent direction by James Hawes, and stellar performances by Rami Malek and Laurence Fishburne, it delivers far more than expected-and lingers with you long after the credits roll.