tmalingre
Joined Oct 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings1K
tmalingre's rating
Reviews4
tmalingre's rating
... this movie is not worth anybody's time. Bad acting, bad directing, low production value, low effort. And wow, if only they'd really go for it, this could be a (mediocre) comedy. I wouldn't be surprised if the cast and crew don't mention this project on their cv.
Additionally, the only hint of on-screen chemistry comes from the 2 leads who are married in real life. The misplaced role played by Gordon Ramsey, especially the last scene, is just painful to watch as well. An hour into this movie, I started monitoring the playtime, hoping it would end swiftly. What a horrible horrible hour and a half.
Additionally, the only hint of on-screen chemistry comes from the 2 leads who are married in real life. The misplaced role played by Gordon Ramsey, especially the last scene, is just painful to watch as well. An hour into this movie, I started monitoring the playtime, hoping it would end swiftly. What a horrible horrible hour and a half.
As with many sequels there's the question if it actually adds something to the storyline and / or could work as a stand alone movie. In the case of Bridget Jones: Mad about a boy, twice the answer would be no.
For those wondering: there's nothing new, nostalgia is played on heavily, entire sequences and love affairs ( that are evidence of the total lack of chemistry between actors) are nonsensical and even feel superfluous.
When the credits roll you can't help but ponder if the snapshots shown from the first 3 films are being used as a way to force linking these happy feeling provoking images to this empty shell of Netflix 13 a dozen flick.
Finally, directing feels inconsistent, acting is mediocre and even the sound is so bad that in many outdoor scenes the conversations sound recorded in the studio. A big miss whereby I had to smirk twice, thus my rating.
For those wondering: there's nothing new, nostalgia is played on heavily, entire sequences and love affairs ( that are evidence of the total lack of chemistry between actors) are nonsensical and even feel superfluous.
When the credits roll you can't help but ponder if the snapshots shown from the first 3 films are being used as a way to force linking these happy feeling provoking images to this empty shell of Netflix 13 a dozen flick.
Finally, directing feels inconsistent, acting is mediocre and even the sound is so bad that in many outdoor scenes the conversations sound recorded in the studio. A big miss whereby I had to smirk twice, thus my rating.
As the title suggests it is definitely a disaster of a movie. In the Netherlands I found this title in the 0,50 Euro bin, but it wasn't even worth that amount. The humor is over over over the top, the script would not have been approved even by a 12-year old who loves fart jokes and naked dolls, which is basically 3/4 of the movie. The endless repetition of this type of jokes made for a 90 minute film that felt like it had a running time of 90 hours. I'm afraid to be caught throwing the DVD in the thrash and somebody noticing it. It would reveal I actually watched this movie.
Many many negative stars.
Just don't watch it......
Many many negative stars.
Just don't watch it......
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken
