nigelcummingsuk-52802
Joined Nov 2016
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews10
nigelcummingsuk-52802's rating
Thos film is so boring. I cant empathise with any of the characters. I can undetstand wjy Michael Crighton absolutely hated
It
What a waste of talemt!
No better than the 1984 version. Lots more sand, dull as dishwater acting. Lead character has all the charisma of a toilet brush. Nice to see Charlotte Rampling getting a part in this film, she is too seldom seen these days. Overall the film though is boring, dull, its sequence of computer graphic generated images, make the film watchable for its technical achievements, but serve to highlight just how two dimensional all the actors in it, are. I suppose they needed the paychecks, but seriously, none of them shoul
d be proud of their performances in it!
The lure of this film were the stars, Colin Baker, Toyah Wilcox and Julian Sands. The reality of this film is the utterly awful script, terrible special effects, dreadful acting that makes 1 and a half hour seem to drag on for three! Avoid it like ghe plague. Dont throw your £4.99 away on Amazon to watch this rubbish! Terrible, truly terrible - all those that appeared in it should be ashamed of themselves. Awful is as awful does!