lewianbra
Joined Jul 2016
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews25
lewianbra's rating
This film has been made by Denise Zmekhol, the daughter of the architect Roger Zmekhol. His apparently best known building was the
Skin of Glass in Sao Paolo, built in the 1960s. Many years after his death, in the 2010s, Denise travels to Sao Paolo to revisit the building to reconnect with the memories of her father. At this time the building was run down and inhabited by homeless squatters.
The architecture of the Skin of Glass, and a bit of other work by Roger Zmekhol, plays some role here, the building is the focal point of the film, and I watched this in an architecture film event, but there is much more to the film.
It is a deeply moving film about family relations, Brazilian history and politics, Sao Paolo and its social conditions, and a bit of psychology. It is a sad film with some optimism. It tells the story of the building as well as some other stories (like that of Roger's life, but also the squatters and homeless are featured), with some unexpected twists. It also has symbolic and poetic value and is about dreams and what they become.
I didn't have high expectations for this film, but was strongly impressed in the end. Maybe as there is so much going on, depending on your motivation to watch this, there will be some stuff that you are not interested in, but anyway. I think it's a very engaging film, and it has a lot of soul. Strongly recommended.
The architecture of the Skin of Glass, and a bit of other work by Roger Zmekhol, plays some role here, the building is the focal point of the film, and I watched this in an architecture film event, but there is much more to the film.
It is a deeply moving film about family relations, Brazilian history and politics, Sao Paolo and its social conditions, and a bit of psychology. It is a sad film with some optimism. It tells the story of the building as well as some other stories (like that of Roger's life, but also the squatters and homeless are featured), with some unexpected twists. It also has symbolic and poetic value and is about dreams and what they become.
I didn't have high expectations for this film, but was strongly impressed in the end. Maybe as there is so much going on, depending on your motivation to watch this, there will be some stuff that you are not interested in, but anyway. I think it's a very engaging film, and it has a lot of soul. Strongly recommended.
Very good and interesting documentary about children that were removed from their families in two communities in 1990s Italy, based on statements that the children made, of which we see some video recordings. Some of their parents were convicted for child abuse and spent many years in prison; this documentary has been made about 20 years later when they had completed their sentences.
The documentary has 5 episodes between 50 and 60 minutes. It is somewhat slow at times, but overall there is enough interesting material that deserves the elaboration over such a time span. Also, the story is somewhat convoluted with many people involved.
The position conveyed by the documentary on the case is quite clear, but to its credit, it gives enough space to those that are on the other side of the argument. This is actually a major attraction of the documentary. You can hear many people involved with their quite different points of view, and you may wonder yourself who is right and who is wrong here. To me it doesn't seem as obvious as one of the other reviewers portrays it. Of course it is also in the nature of such a documentary that the material doesn't quite suffice to dissolve every possible doubt (although it may be enough for some).
Up until the end you hear rather incompatible points of view from people who mostly (on both sides) come over as credible. The main psychologist, heavily criticised as major villain by some, actually conducts herself quite well here. You may wonder all the time "how can this be?" - even if you settle for the explanation that is apparently favoured by the people who made this documentary (which for sure has something going for it, but not everything).
It is a sad story with impact on everyone who is still alive, the children, the parents, also other people involved. It is also a story well worthwhile spending 5 hours of your time on. Should children always be believed? Probably not. But here?
The documentary has 5 episodes between 50 and 60 minutes. It is somewhat slow at times, but overall there is enough interesting material that deserves the elaboration over such a time span. Also, the story is somewhat convoluted with many people involved.
The position conveyed by the documentary on the case is quite clear, but to its credit, it gives enough space to those that are on the other side of the argument. This is actually a major attraction of the documentary. You can hear many people involved with their quite different points of view, and you may wonder yourself who is right and who is wrong here. To me it doesn't seem as obvious as one of the other reviewers portrays it. Of course it is also in the nature of such a documentary that the material doesn't quite suffice to dissolve every possible doubt (although it may be enough for some).
Up until the end you hear rather incompatible points of view from people who mostly (on both sides) come over as credible. The main psychologist, heavily criticised as major villain by some, actually conducts herself quite well here. You may wonder all the time "how can this be?" - even if you settle for the explanation that is apparently favoured by the people who made this documentary (which for sure has something going for it, but not everything).
It is a sad story with impact on everyone who is still alive, the children, the parents, also other people involved. It is also a story well worthwhile spending 5 hours of your time on. Should children always be believed? Probably not. But here?
This film has several strong points. The photography of the Po Valley landscape is stunning, and creates a strong atmosphere.
Although the Avvocato Morsiano is just out to do his not very spectacular job (namely estimating the land), it feels like he enters some kind of dreamland (if not nightmare land). The often dysfunctional communication and also the behaviour of some people is quite funny at times and adds to this impression.
The acting is good. The themes of corruption and illegal agricultural practices are relevant and probably portrayed in a fairly realistic way. The plot focuses on Morsiano finding out some things that he shouldn't know, and the attempt of the locals to deal with him.
That said, as promising as proceedings start, and as much as there are many little surprises in the details, the plot itself is rather straight and predictable. Giulia Boschi is very beautiful and her acting is fine, but her role and the love story that carries much of the second half of the film have little credibility in my view, and add unwelcome cliche to a film that at the end doesn't quite fulfill the promise of the mysterious and strange beginning.
Although the Avvocato Morsiano is just out to do his not very spectacular job (namely estimating the land), it feels like he enters some kind of dreamland (if not nightmare land). The often dysfunctional communication and also the behaviour of some people is quite funny at times and adds to this impression.
The acting is good. The themes of corruption and illegal agricultural practices are relevant and probably portrayed in a fairly realistic way. The plot focuses on Morsiano finding out some things that he shouldn't know, and the attempt of the locals to deal with him.
That said, as promising as proceedings start, and as much as there are many little surprises in the details, the plot itself is rather straight and predictable. Giulia Boschi is very beautiful and her acting is fine, but her role and the love story that carries much of the second half of the film have little credibility in my view, and add unwelcome cliche to a film that at the end doesn't quite fulfill the promise of the mysterious and strange beginning.