eastdane-01260
Joined Apr 2016
Welcome to the new profile
We're making some updates, and some features will be temporarily unavailable while we enhance your experience. The previous version will not be accessible after 7/14. Stay tuned for the upcoming relaunch.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
eastdane-01260's rating
What a terrific episode. Great performances and a brilliant, moving script. Very good visuals as well, the world of Alabama in 1955 felt real. I didn't think it was preachy at all, but these days mentioning or depicting racism, or depicting an important historical event is seen as being "preachy."
As someone who has been watching this show for a long time, this is one of the best and most important episodes I've ever seen, and one that's truly worthy of all the acclaim it's been given. I don't think it's a coincidence that almost all of the 1 star reviews come from accounts made in recent days...
As someone who has been watching this show for a long time, this is one of the best and most important episodes I've ever seen, and one that's truly worthy of all the acclaim it's been given. I don't think it's a coincidence that almost all of the 1 star reviews come from accounts made in recent days...
Whittaker and Small are great, but the plot is unbelievable in many points. It's tense and well acted. Too much lens flare though.
I don't see how people are saying that Whittaker gave a weak performance. She did a great job imo (but she's absolutely incredible in Paddy Considine's "Journeyman"). The writing made her character unlikable though.
8 out of 10- tense, well acted, a bit unbelievable
I don't see how people are saying that Whittaker gave a weak performance. She did a great job imo (but she's absolutely incredible in Paddy Considine's "Journeyman"). The writing made her character unlikable though.
8 out of 10- tense, well acted, a bit unbelievable
