[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

scattering_like_light

Joined Aug 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Reviews7

scattering_like_light's rating
Avatar

Avatar

7.9
9
  • Dec 19, 2009
  • Absolutely worth seeing, despite slightly ropey story.

    It is very difficult to start a review of this film without mentioning the obvious greatest thing about it. Graphically, stylistically, and technically, I am struggling to find a single flaw. It has without doubt been made with unusual care, and rigorous attention to the most minute of details.

    It uses the very best we have so far in terms of 3D technology in the film, and breaks new ground in the way that 3D work interacts with the audience. Yes, I saw it with the little glasses, and it was all the better for it - 3D has indeed come a long way since the red and green filters idea.

    The film did achieve another big winning goal in that I did emotionally connect to it on at least one occasion, though I was only moved to tears by the sheer level of breathtaking beauty in it, and not by any scenes of great emotional character turmoil. Those are there, and are not done badly, or acted dishonestly, but they lack 'something' which will probably come to me when my head has stopped spinning from the glorious visuals. I will say nothing more about the look of it - me and a few thousand others have already got that covered. Oh no - one more thing. This is the second film to (almost) truly nail CGI facial expressions. LOTR and Gollum was pretty damn good, and this is comparable, though not necessarily better. OK, perhaps fractionally better.

    Heads and thumbs up to Richard Taylor and crew for design work to rival Lord of the Rings - creatures and machines are particularly well executed and have an extra sense of credulity to them because they are both based on evolution of one kind or another. Likewise, in another area - the various spiritual beliefs of the na'vi are backed up (albeit rather cursorily) by at least a reference to 'scientific verification', so not just the total mystical sh1t we so often see.

    So it all comes down to the story, and whether you like it or not. I don't think I did, on the whole, because I really despise the way that humans just dive in to anything new they encounter and try and exploit it, and this film does make you think about that quite a lot. I hated the American 'gung-ho' self-righteous thing, as usual, but was impressed that Cameron dealt with it as well as he did - it certainly wasn't played up to nauseating levels, as it sometimes can be, and the later part of the storyline gets better in that respect, as the tale unfolds...

    I suspect the storyline we see has more to do with making sure all the 'winning movie' standard bases were covered, than being led entirely by itself. I would have liked to have seen a more imaginative way of getting action in there than what they did (principally a massive battle scene or 3), but can equally see why they made the choices they did.

    All in all, it's epically lovely, and you should go and see it. It was certainly one of the most entertaining and jaw-dropping films I have ever seen. Well done Mr Cameron and friends...
    2012

    2012

    5.8
    8
  • Dec 3, 2009
  • Fx++

    Harry Potter et le Prince de sang-mêlé

    Harry Potter et le Prince de sang-mêlé

    7.6
    1
  • Aug 5, 2009
  • David Yates - a man responsible for single-handedly ruining Harry Potter.

    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.