laredj81
Joined Jun 2014
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings2.5K
laredj81's rating
Reviews27
laredj81's rating
The film may seem to present a critical portrayal that is uncivilized, especially with its bloody narrative. However, within this narrative, a fundamental question arises: which of the two operates in the realm of primitivism and savagery?
This question is crucial because other elements may not be as significant; they, in a way, broaden the scope of visual and behavioral disturbance. Yet, they are necessary as they illustrate the extent of a civilized person's ability to become primitive when faced with an existential disparity in the concepts of others and their relationships.
There is a secondary aspect that the film attempts to communicate, highlighting the media's capacity to endorse actions deemed right by the civilized person, no matter how low and degrading they may be. The overall idea deals with the historical projection of how former European civilization and its cultural methods persist in dealing with primitive peoples, extending into contemporary times.
While the film adopts a documentary approach, which may not be cinematically significant, it holds importance in conveying concepts such as the primitiveness of civilized consciousness. In short, the film represents the notion of how culture and its pioneers can dominate and harm any entity perceived as inferior from a refined perspective.
In the end, the primitive may engage in a ritual of sacrifice or killing in self-defense, but cultural and civilized societies practice collective death for entertainment and mastery.
This question is crucial because other elements may not be as significant; they, in a way, broaden the scope of visual and behavioral disturbance. Yet, they are necessary as they illustrate the extent of a civilized person's ability to become primitive when faced with an existential disparity in the concepts of others and their relationships.
There is a secondary aspect that the film attempts to communicate, highlighting the media's capacity to endorse actions deemed right by the civilized person, no matter how low and degrading they may be. The overall idea deals with the historical projection of how former European civilization and its cultural methods persist in dealing with primitive peoples, extending into contemporary times.
While the film adopts a documentary approach, which may not be cinematically significant, it holds importance in conveying concepts such as the primitiveness of civilized consciousness. In short, the film represents the notion of how culture and its pioneers can dominate and harm any entity perceived as inferior from a refined perspective.
In the end, the primitive may engage in a ritual of sacrifice or killing in self-defense, but cultural and civilized societies practice collective death for entertainment and mastery.
To engage in the contemporary cultural discourse on history and present it as a manifestation of historical truth, even if it is through certain scenes or dialogues, is, in my perception, an attempt to solidify a stereotypical image of history itself, disregarding certain facts about historical conflicts and their political, social, and religious implications, particularly in the realm of cinema. If the film falls within the biographical genre, as is the case with Ferrara's latest work, there is a slight manipulation of history, giving a cultural impression of the struggle between fascism and socialism in early Italy. This presentation, however, remains stylized in some scenes. Nonetheless, on a general level, the film follows Ferrara's typical pattern of evoking an ominous and mysterious presence without clear substantiation. There is an obsession with objects and affiliations from various factions, despite their lack of convergence. The anarchists, democratic socialists, fascist socialists, communists, Catholic Church, and the central figure, Father Padre, all become entangled in an attempt to depict a cryptic part of his life. Although some documented information about Padre's life confirms his inclination towards the fascist social order and his support for arming fascists, Ferrara intended to create a world that is less stringent in its adherence to the biographical truth, making Padre's struggle a wholly separate and internal one, detached from the political landscape and the immediate post-World War I events.
I believe Ferrara's depictions are critical in addressing the clergy's involvement in the dark side of human conflict. He aimed to present Padre not as an active participant and supporter of fascism, but he did not dismiss the darker aspects of the church's ideological and religious rigidity in Padre's mind, and its tendency towards violence against anyone deviating from Jesus Christ's teachings.
The film offers limited political insights into Italy during the 1920s, and it presents an idealized approach to understanding the achievement of a political justice system from a populist perspective, which halted the military regression, albeit symbolically, towards destruction towards the end of the film.
Overall, the film operates within a commendable framework, and I found myself relatively intrigued by Ferrara's cautious presentation of the desired imagery, without delving extensively into explicating it. They are fleeting and delicate glimpses into the life of a martyr of faith, a neutral observer of the daily human struggle, seeking to achieve a sense of justice within the mechanisms of exploitation.
I thoroughly enjoyed Shia LaBeouf's portrayal of the character Padre.
I believe Ferrara's depictions are critical in addressing the clergy's involvement in the dark side of human conflict. He aimed to present Padre not as an active participant and supporter of fascism, but he did not dismiss the darker aspects of the church's ideological and religious rigidity in Padre's mind, and its tendency towards violence against anyone deviating from Jesus Christ's teachings.
The film offers limited political insights into Italy during the 1920s, and it presents an idealized approach to understanding the achievement of a political justice system from a populist perspective, which halted the military regression, albeit symbolically, towards destruction towards the end of the film.
Overall, the film operates within a commendable framework, and I found myself relatively intrigued by Ferrara's cautious presentation of the desired imagery, without delving extensively into explicating it. They are fleeting and delicate glimpses into the life of a martyr of faith, a neutral observer of the daily human struggle, seeking to achieve a sense of justice within the mechanisms of exploitation.
I thoroughly enjoyed Shia LaBeouf's portrayal of the character Padre.