MovieCriticOnline

Good movie, but not a perfect movie for a number of reasons, although I do recommend it, among so many bad movies coming out.

For example, they introduced the doctor on screen but after that substantial amount of tim ewe never got back to him, like we did with Harry.

Also, it was hard to root for anyone, because they were no really good people in there. Sure, movies with anti-heroes can be great, and this was definitely a good movie, but part of me wished there was just a few decent people in there somewhere, maybe that were taken for a ride like Seth and the on their own stood up to them.

Seth was a perpetual liar even when he had the opportunity to do good, he didn't until he had no other choice.

Also, the relationship was weird between Seth and Greg. Just seemed very odd that Greg wanted Seth to be part of the team, but then kept fighting with him, especially over Abbie. That part didn't make much sense.

Chris, Greg, Richie, Adam etc all knew they were stealing peoples money and did nothing.

The only one with some redeeming qualities was Seth's dad, who kept getting schnookered by his son.

In the end, there was no real reason for Seth to do what he did, with that type of family behind him, so it felt a bit contrived to me.

Over all I recommend it, but with the foregoing caveats.

This movie was all over the place and ... not in a good way. Too much back and forth, hated the cast, never believed it that it was the 60s/70, just the typical Netflix look to it. Zac was miscast and the acting was wooden and not believable. Usually when filmmakers do so many time cuts and flashbacks it's a sign of a very weak story.

I don't understand the obsession with serial killers and definitely not the worshipping or idolization of them. They did it, by NOT showing what he did to the girls.

Why was this movie made, to sympathize with Bundy? If it was just for pure entertainment, then just show what he did. I literally got bored after 20 minutes. It was just like a BAD TV drama. Let's be honest I think most people who watch these type of films want to see the actual killings, and then why, and then see what happens to the killers, i.e. Getting justice. I didn't want to see a court room drama. It was just boring and a lot of it was inaccurate and too much felt repetitive throughout, in terms of shots/scenes/characters.. and who cares about that Liz side-character, it was totally useless to spend that much time on her.

Also, I am SO SICK of watching movies allow a SINGLE cop/detective to go around interview, visit witnesses/suspects...

The best and most interesting part of the movie was the end footage of the real people.

SKIP IT!

First, I am not sure why Disney can't make more original movies instead of the endless remakes. It shows where we are at today, totally devoid of any creativeness.

I wanted to compare the actual original story of Snow White with this new version. Especially the ending.

In the Grimm's book, the queen made one apple, but it was only PARTIALLY poisoned, the red side, the white side was fine and the queen offered Snow White the red side while eating herself the white side. When Snow White died, the Queen went back to the castle and asked the "Looking-glass against the wall, Who is fairest of us all?" at last it answered, "You are the fairest now of all."

After the dwarfs found Snow White dead they made a glass coffin for her and sat her on the mountain hill where one day the Prince rode by and offered to by her, but they first refused, until he promised to take care of her and them so the finally agreed to bring the coffin to the Castle, but on the way "they stumbled over a bush, and with the shaking the bit of poisoned apple flew out of her throat. It was not long before she opened her eyes, threw up the cover of the coffin, and sat up, alive and well."

While the prince and Snow White got married the Queen asked the looking-glass answered, "O Queen, although you are of beauty rare, The young bride is a thousand times more fair." The queen railed and cursed, and was beside herself with disappointment and anger. The queen felt she should have "no peace until she went and saw the bride. And when she saw her she knew her for Snow-white, and could not stir from the place for anger and terror. For they had ready red-hot iron shoes, in which she had to dance until she fell down dead."

So the queen didn't die until AFTER the wedding. Back to this new monstrosity version.

The cast was totally miscast, from Gal being way too beautiful compared to Rachel playing Snow White. It was almost laughable the stark contrast it was. The whole point of the original Snow White is the Queen was jealous of Snow White's beauty.

The original Snow White, she was a kind, selfless person that enjoyed cleaning for the 7 dwarfs, but the new one she went straight to sleep. Is cleaning and cooking that offensive these days?

Then, the atrocious looking CGI garden gnomes of the 7 dwarfs, cause apparently it was offensive to hire actual dwarfs. This is PC running amok. And unlike the original Disney characters who were distinctly different, here they all kinda looked the same.

And a lot of the important, cute exposition from the original is missing, like when Snow White comments on the names of the dwarfs after she cleans, the new one she just goes to sleep right away, like she is entitled to sleep there, compared to the original where she verbalized that IF she cleaned their place they may let her stay, in other words, she wanted to do a good deed in hopes of getting something in exchange.

The prince wasn't even a prince, he was just some thief and no real good reason why she fell for him, he was kinda annoying. That whole bandit story was utterly pointless and the ending was atrociously embarrassing.