m-fleisher

First, the single 2-star rating was generous but that can be forgiven. However, the 10-star rating, by someone whose only contribution to this site was this single review the year it was released, is unforgivable. This "film" has literally no redeeming qualities. It is poorly made regardless of a low budget. Don't waste your time on this less than college student project.

Every level is a poor effort. If this was made in 1958 and not 2018, one might give it a little slack. Front to back t is trite, effortless, artless, and sloppy. Why it is an 18+ movie is a mystery. It is not adult, it is juvenile.

This low, low budget movie won't disappoint unless you're looking for reasonable acting, directing, writing, sound, lighting, editing, or a plot that makes sense. In fact, every aspect of the film making process was done artlessly. Perhaps the only creative area that showed some slight success was in the casting. That is not to say that the actors who landed their roles displayed significant acting ability. The casting was partially successful in finding some faces that fit the characters, and only hit and miss at that for a small cast. The sleazy actor looked the part. The two lead actors looked like thoughtless, reckless, twisted individuals. And unfortunately, that is about it for highlights. In hindsight, five stars was very generous and will likely be one of the higher ratings. Those involved took some risks, creative and financial, that just didn't produce a satisfying end result. If I were a gambling soul, the over/under for rating will probably be closer to 2.0.