lynxx55
Joined Jun 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings558
lynxx55's rating
Reviews4
lynxx55's rating
Unfortunately, despite hundreds of years of folklore, this film presents fairies as small, saccharine, and communicative. They are described as small winged persons, and also as abstract and symbolic representations of the natural world.
The presenters also tell of some ancient incompatibility between fairies and humans, who came from the stars. Nevertheless, our creativity comes directly from appreciation of fairy/human interaction.
Additionally, brief instructions for building a fairy house are furnished.
The presenters also tell of some ancient incompatibility between fairies and humans, who came from the stars. Nevertheless, our creativity comes directly from appreciation of fairy/human interaction.
Additionally, brief instructions for building a fairy house are furnished.
Very awkward and stilted. Jokes are forced. Of course we recognize the clichés of working for a big company, but simply to apply them to a comic book city is just not that funny or intelligent.
Alan Tudyk did his best with the material given, but it did not support his brilliant comedy talent. The lead actor (what's her name?) is a properly perky chipmunk, but it is all for nothing. Story? What story? It's merely a random thought stretched to try to fill twenty- two minutes. Also, a superhero story has to have mandatory special effects, but here the use of cgi is minimal and sad.
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.
Alan Tudyk did his best with the material given, but it did not support his brilliant comedy talent. The lead actor (what's her name?) is a properly perky chipmunk, but it is all for nothing. Story? What story? It's merely a random thought stretched to try to fill twenty- two minutes. Also, a superhero story has to have mandatory special effects, but here the use of cgi is minimal and sad.
Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.
This show is even more stupid and contrived than most "reality TV" shows. Let's take some exciting buzzwords: "lost treasure", "pirates", "templars", "shipwreck", "Captain Kidd" and mash them up with legend and folktales and conjecture. Let's call it "scientific archaeological discovery".
The so-called recovered silver ingots presented to the President of Madagascar were later determined to be 95% lead fakes. UNESCO investigators stated that the sunken ship was not Kidd's. It was not even a ship, but a broken part of the harbor construction.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-33524216
This program is also a "lead fake".
The so-called recovered silver ingots presented to the President of Madagascar were later determined to be 95% lead fakes. UNESCO investigators stated that the sunken ship was not Kidd's. It was not even a ship, but a broken part of the harbor construction.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-33524216
This program is also a "lead fake".
Recently taken polls
51 total polls taken
