RedDQ
Joined Aug 2014
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews1
RedDQ's rating
The cryptozoologists in this show are completely blind to the very real evidence they acquire in the show for the things they "can't explain". Luckily there are two people in the crew who don't shrug off the obvious and often stumble upon an actual explanation, much to the dismay of the CZs...
When presented with "inconclusive" on a dna test, cryptozooligists tend to see that as evidence of an unknown species. Instead of a poor sample, which would be almost certain given that I saw zero actual scientific collection methods.
It's over-sensationalized, somewhat entertaining, but ultimately, completely worthless. I wish there were actual analytical minds going through Sanderson's files, instead of people who saw complete fact in his writings and audio, and took them as gospel.
When presented with "inconclusive" on a dna test, cryptozooligists tend to see that as evidence of an unknown species. Instead of a poor sample, which would be almost certain given that I saw zero actual scientific collection methods.
It's over-sensationalized, somewhat entertaining, but ultimately, completely worthless. I wish there were actual analytical minds going through Sanderson's files, instead of people who saw complete fact in his writings and audio, and took them as gospel.