adelized
Joined Apr 2013
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings1.7K
adelized's rating
Reviews3
adelized's rating
Ridley Scott's Gladiator (2000) remains an undisputed masterpiece-a film that blended visceral action, profound emotional stakes, and unforgettable characters. Tragically, Gladiator 2 fails to honor its legacy, delivering a tedious, uninspired sequel that lacks the soul of its predecessor.
From the outset, the film struggles with a fundamental flaw: its protagonist. Unlike Russell Crowe's Maximus-a figure of gravitas, tragedy, and fiery resolve-this new lead is a hollow shell. Stone-faced and devoid of charisma, he elicits neither empathy nor disdain, merely indifference. A gladiator should command the screen; instead, this character lulls it into a coma.
The antagonists fare no better. Where Joaquin Phoenix's Commodus was a mesmerizing blend of cruelty and vulnerability, the villains here are cartoonish, their actions so exaggerated they border on parody. Denzel Washington, usually a powerhouse, is reduced to repetitive scowls and eyebrow raises-a performance as monotonous as the script demands. Only Pedro Pascal manages fleeting moments of engagement, though even he cannot salvage the wreckage.
Visually, the film falters. The CGI-particularly the laughably artificial monkeys and battle sequences-shatters immersion. Worse yet is the narrative betrayal: the revelation that Maximus, a man defined by his devotion to family, allegedly engaged in infidelity. This twist doesn't deepen his mythos; it undermines it, feeling cheap and unearned.
Gladiator 2 is a misfire on nearly every level-a soulless spectacle that misunderstands what made the original resonate. It's not just a bad sequel; it's an insult to the legacy of a film that deserved far better.
From the outset, the film struggles with a fundamental flaw: its protagonist. Unlike Russell Crowe's Maximus-a figure of gravitas, tragedy, and fiery resolve-this new lead is a hollow shell. Stone-faced and devoid of charisma, he elicits neither empathy nor disdain, merely indifference. A gladiator should command the screen; instead, this character lulls it into a coma.
The antagonists fare no better. Where Joaquin Phoenix's Commodus was a mesmerizing blend of cruelty and vulnerability, the villains here are cartoonish, their actions so exaggerated they border on parody. Denzel Washington, usually a powerhouse, is reduced to repetitive scowls and eyebrow raises-a performance as monotonous as the script demands. Only Pedro Pascal manages fleeting moments of engagement, though even he cannot salvage the wreckage.
Visually, the film falters. The CGI-particularly the laughably artificial monkeys and battle sequences-shatters immersion. Worse yet is the narrative betrayal: the revelation that Maximus, a man defined by his devotion to family, allegedly engaged in infidelity. This twist doesn't deepen his mythos; it undermines it, feeling cheap and unearned.
Gladiator 2 is a misfire on nearly every level-a soulless spectacle that misunderstands what made the original resonate. It's not just a bad sequel; it's an insult to the legacy of a film that deserved far better.
A movie with a stupid scenario . it was boring and disappointing . the film made a stupid attempt to make the audience laugh with a very foolish story . the worst movie i 've ever seen .
Aren't these actors and director ashamed after being seen? What is their purpose to make this ridiculous film?