haladay
Joined Mar 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews6
haladay's rating
When my friend and I rented this movie, we sat down with the intent that it was going to make fun of trekkies. But after watching it, my opinion actually changed about them. And for the better.
This movie not only shows the fans, but it talks about the culture itself. I ended up actually respecting the Gene Roddenberry trekkies because Roddenberry wanted an upbeat future. Something where humanity was actually better over all. And the fans that followed his idea are very friendly and accepting. Even the ones that emulate the war like Klingons are still a lot more friendly than other sci fi fans you will meet.
I'm not saying all of the fans are like this. I've met some of the more egotistical ones, but that is mainly on the inet where you have a tendency to run into people that have very little social skills. But the people in this movie are actually quite normal! As for the movie, Denise Crosby does a great job as both host and interviewer. She asked questions in a non-biased way, which is the most we could want in a reporter.
I liked Star Trek: The Next Generation but not the other series in the franchise so I wouldn't call myself a trekkie. I never went to a convention and don't plan on ever. So this movie was an eye opener. I'll deal with theses Roddenberry fans over any other TV show fanatics any day of the week. In fact, I'll take these fans over sports fans as well. Trek may be dorkie, but I never heard of a trekkie booing the first black Star Trek actor like Philly fans did to Jackie Robinson in baseball.
Oh, and as a side note. During the Klingon language class scene, my friend and I had to stop the tape and rewind to watch it again. The one woman in the class was hot. We were dumbstruck by the fact that an attractive female was trying to learn Klingon :P
This movie not only shows the fans, but it talks about the culture itself. I ended up actually respecting the Gene Roddenberry trekkies because Roddenberry wanted an upbeat future. Something where humanity was actually better over all. And the fans that followed his idea are very friendly and accepting. Even the ones that emulate the war like Klingons are still a lot more friendly than other sci fi fans you will meet.
I'm not saying all of the fans are like this. I've met some of the more egotistical ones, but that is mainly on the inet where you have a tendency to run into people that have very little social skills. But the people in this movie are actually quite normal! As for the movie, Denise Crosby does a great job as both host and interviewer. She asked questions in a non-biased way, which is the most we could want in a reporter.
I liked Star Trek: The Next Generation but not the other series in the franchise so I wouldn't call myself a trekkie. I never went to a convention and don't plan on ever. So this movie was an eye opener. I'll deal with theses Roddenberry fans over any other TV show fanatics any day of the week. In fact, I'll take these fans over sports fans as well. Trek may be dorkie, but I never heard of a trekkie booing the first black Star Trek actor like Philly fans did to Jackie Robinson in baseball.
Oh, and as a side note. During the Klingon language class scene, my friend and I had to stop the tape and rewind to watch it again. The one woman in the class was hot. We were dumbstruck by the fact that an attractive female was trying to learn Klingon :P
What I got out of this movie was that his idea was that Capitalism is detrimental to democracy. He did have good points but there were some flaws.
It came off as saying that capitalism is all out bad, he even had priest going against it. That would be like saying money is evil. both aren't necessarily evil, they just make people do evil things. Communism's downfall is sloth, Capitalism's downfall is greed. Both systems can work if you control these flaws. Since both are deadly sins, it would have been good to see it addressed with the priests but it wasn't. So it does feel like some of the focus is misplaced and that is something I felt watching the movie.
But he was right about many things, that democracy is hurt by capitalism, as he showed with the democrats switching on the wall street bail out last year. There was also many fine examples of how we as people, are nothing more than numbers, and in some cases, commodities to corporations (ie corp. taking out life insurance policies and the Wilkes-Barre children prison incident) where we are investments or even worth more dead to the company.
He doesn't offer a new system instead of capitalism, just reminds us that it is our right to stand up against such injustices. As was pointed out, they have the money to buy politicians, but we are the majority and its still one person, one vote.
It came off as saying that capitalism is all out bad, he even had priest going against it. That would be like saying money is evil. both aren't necessarily evil, they just make people do evil things. Communism's downfall is sloth, Capitalism's downfall is greed. Both systems can work if you control these flaws. Since both are deadly sins, it would have been good to see it addressed with the priests but it wasn't. So it does feel like some of the focus is misplaced and that is something I felt watching the movie.
But he was right about many things, that democracy is hurt by capitalism, as he showed with the democrats switching on the wall street bail out last year. There was also many fine examples of how we as people, are nothing more than numbers, and in some cases, commodities to corporations (ie corp. taking out life insurance policies and the Wilkes-Barre children prison incident) where we are investments or even worth more dead to the company.
He doesn't offer a new system instead of capitalism, just reminds us that it is our right to stand up against such injustices. As was pointed out, they have the money to buy politicians, but we are the majority and its still one person, one vote.
First I want to talk about why I liked White Castle. It didn't try to be an emotional ride, it was simply 2 guys going from point A to point B. That's it, that simple. It focused more on the different events the 2 run into on the road to White Castle. I liked it for it. Sometimes you want a deep plot, great action sequences, round characters, and sometimes you just want to let your brain veg out and watch a low brow comedy. The later is what White Castle is.
This second one tried too hard to top the first. They stuck a love story that wasn't very original. The plot, dialog, and characters felt different, like another group of writers who never saw the first wrote it. The gags and jokes were more intended to offend and shock than to make you laugh. I sat there in the theater and felt like the writers were huge Howard Stern fans and were trying to pay his style and humor homage any chance they could at the cost of a better joke. Too often a scene feels like its going to be good but then they disjoint any sense of comedic timing with some needless sex visual.
Harold and Kumar is supposed to be a stoner comedy, not a sex comedy.
This second one tried too hard to top the first. They stuck a love story that wasn't very original. The plot, dialog, and characters felt different, like another group of writers who never saw the first wrote it. The gags and jokes were more intended to offend and shock than to make you laugh. I sat there in the theater and felt like the writers were huge Howard Stern fans and were trying to pay his style and humor homage any chance they could at the cost of a better joke. Too often a scene feels like its going to be good but then they disjoint any sense of comedic timing with some needless sex visual.
Harold and Kumar is supposed to be a stoner comedy, not a sex comedy.