orient_86
Joined Jan 2005
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see ratings breakdowns and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews14
orient_86's rating
I watched the rerun of the show when I was 15-16 and at the time I thought it was the best show ever. I still like it.
The acting may not be the best and the show lost its touch in the end (as usual) but it was classy, intriguing and entertaining. And it was the show that broke the "houswife TV-woman" once and forever. The girls could and they did. But they were still girls. They dressed with taste, fell in love, wore bikini and didn't treat men like dirt. They were tough but feminine.
And the truth be told, I was really ******-off when they made a remake out of the show - Charlies Angels movies. Non of them had that little extra that the show had.
The acting may not be the best and the show lost its touch in the end (as usual) but it was classy, intriguing and entertaining. And it was the show that broke the "houswife TV-woman" once and forever. The girls could and they did. But they were still girls. They dressed with taste, fell in love, wore bikini and didn't treat men like dirt. They were tough but feminine.
And the truth be told, I was really ******-off when they made a remake out of the show - Charlies Angels movies. Non of them had that little extra that the show had.
What happened? How could "the father" of Terminator and the guy who made a brilliant sequel to "The Alien" direct this sentimental and poorly acted piece of trash? Thre's no argue about the special effects - they're excellent, and it's OK to show a tragic story like that, but why put a dumb love story in front of it? It's modern versions of "Romeo and Juliette" like this that made the original story stereotypical. They're just too many.
And what's with the casting? First of all there's DiCaprio - oh, boy! Second of all there Kate Winslet - she's a good actress but all the time I thought that Rose was like 20-somethingm and then I find out that she was 17! Excuse me, but Kate Winlset couldn't possibly pass for 17! She didn't look like 17 at all! There're plenty of other good actresses who could be 17 back then. Take Natalie Portman. She's both talented and very beautiful.
It's disappointing to see what James Cameron did this time.
I give it a 3 for the visuals.
And what's with the casting? First of all there's DiCaprio - oh, boy! Second of all there Kate Winslet - she's a good actress but all the time I thought that Rose was like 20-somethingm and then I find out that she was 17! Excuse me, but Kate Winlset couldn't possibly pass for 17! She didn't look like 17 at all! There're plenty of other good actresses who could be 17 back then. Take Natalie Portman. She's both talented and very beautiful.
It's disappointing to see what James Cameron did this time.
I give it a 3 for the visuals.