steffenhoffmann
Joined Jan 2005
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
steffenhoffmann's rating
It could have worked.
It really could have.
Kidman? Cute, dreamy, funny-floating through the part like it was written just for her. The rest of the cast? Also quite decent, hitting the right notes, doing what they were hired to do. The idea itself? Not bad at all. A cute spin on a classic. It had potential.
And then: Ferrell.
What was that?
A performance so tonally off it feels like sabotage. He's not funny he's unbearable. Like he wandered in from another movie entirely and thought it was The Ladies Man 2: Now With More Mugging. Every scene he's in drags the whole thing down.
There's no charm. No tension. No connection.
It's not the script. It's not the cast. It's him.
Casting: criminal. Direction: asleep at the wheel.
This could've been a cult holiday staple warm, weird, sweet.
Instead?
A total mess.
Unwatchable.
It really could have.
Kidman? Cute, dreamy, funny-floating through the part like it was written just for her. The rest of the cast? Also quite decent, hitting the right notes, doing what they were hired to do. The idea itself? Not bad at all. A cute spin on a classic. It had potential.
And then: Ferrell.
What was that?
A performance so tonally off it feels like sabotage. He's not funny he's unbearable. Like he wandered in from another movie entirely and thought it was The Ladies Man 2: Now With More Mugging. Every scene he's in drags the whole thing down.
There's no charm. No tension. No connection.
It's not the script. It's not the cast. It's him.
Casting: criminal. Direction: asleep at the wheel.
This could've been a cult holiday staple warm, weird, sweet.
Instead?
A total mess.
Unwatchable.
The Tom Green Show Documentary isn't just nostalgia. It's a quiet revelation.
Through home videos, candid interviews, and Green's own narration, the film peels back the layers of a man best known for 90s cringe.
What emerges is a portrait of an artist who turned absurdity into a vision and walked away to let the world catch up.
There's warmth in the way Green reflects, decades later. Archival clips take on new depth when framed by his current life. At his breathtakingly beautiful cabin. Reflecting with his parents.
The film argues, gently but persuasively, that beneath the intentional stupidity hides a sharp comic genius. One that shaped everything from Jackass to modern Late Night Shows to TikTok prank culture.
What sticks isn't the absurde clips. Though some still made laugh. It's the storytelling. In quieter moments. Being at Letterman. Getting older. Cancer survival. Burnout. He reveals a vulnerability that reframes his legacy. You're left marveling not at how wild he once was. But how human he's always been.
Through home videos, candid interviews, and Green's own narration, the film peels back the layers of a man best known for 90s cringe.
What emerges is a portrait of an artist who turned absurdity into a vision and walked away to let the world catch up.
There's warmth in the way Green reflects, decades later. Archival clips take on new depth when framed by his current life. At his breathtakingly beautiful cabin. Reflecting with his parents.
The film argues, gently but persuasively, that beneath the intentional stupidity hides a sharp comic genius. One that shaped everything from Jackass to modern Late Night Shows to TikTok prank culture.
What sticks isn't the absurde clips. Though some still made laugh. It's the storytelling. In quieter moments. Being at Letterman. Getting older. Cancer survival. Burnout. He reveals a vulnerability that reframes his legacy. You're left marveling not at how wild he once was. But how human he's always been.
"Star Trek: Section 31" is a profound betrayal of everything that makes Star Trek beloved.
It feels like a cheap '90s sci-fi pilot that never even made it to series.
The plot is a convoluted mess, lacking the creativity and depth we've come to expect from the franchise.
The casting and acting are subpar, and the set design fails to capture the essence of Star Trek's visionary future.
It doesn't just look cheap-it looks random, forgettable, uninspired. Where classic Star Trek gave us a universe to dream about, to aspire to, this movie gives us... what? A bad episode of "Cleopatra 2525"? A rejected "Power Rangers" spinoff? Something that belongs in a VHS bargain bin next to "Mutant X"?
This isn't just bad Star Trek. It's bad science fiction, period.
Instead of a grand vision of the future, we get a cartoonish, low-budget disaster that looks like it was shot in someone's basement with leftover props from a failed SyFy Channel pilot.
It's a disgrace, especially considering the involvement of a talented lead actor whose career may now be permanently stained by this debacle.
The director and producers have missed the mark entirely.
Please, go back to whatever you did before, but don't make movies and don't touch Star Trek again.
You've not just missed the mark-you've obliterated it.
This is truly bad.
It feels like a cheap '90s sci-fi pilot that never even made it to series.
The plot is a convoluted mess, lacking the creativity and depth we've come to expect from the franchise.
The casting and acting are subpar, and the set design fails to capture the essence of Star Trek's visionary future.
It doesn't just look cheap-it looks random, forgettable, uninspired. Where classic Star Trek gave us a universe to dream about, to aspire to, this movie gives us... what? A bad episode of "Cleopatra 2525"? A rejected "Power Rangers" spinoff? Something that belongs in a VHS bargain bin next to "Mutant X"?
This isn't just bad Star Trek. It's bad science fiction, period.
Instead of a grand vision of the future, we get a cartoonish, low-budget disaster that looks like it was shot in someone's basement with leftover props from a failed SyFy Channel pilot.
It's a disgrace, especially considering the involvement of a talented lead actor whose career may now be permanently stained by this debacle.
The director and producers have missed the mark entirely.
Please, go back to whatever you did before, but don't make movies and don't touch Star Trek again.
You've not just missed the mark-you've obliterated it.
This is truly bad.
Recently taken polls
2 total polls taken
