sylvester27
Joined Jun 2013
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews10
sylvester27's rating
Boring Harlequinesc trash that has a title of rogue agent. Very boring dull misleading tripe. Don't waste any time on this turkey. Do yourself a favor; save your wine and gravy for another time. I was curious when the cautions stated smoking and drinking in the beginning. Because, that's all this 2 hour turd rogue agent gets up to. Absolutely, a whole lot of nothing close to entertaining rogue agent behavior happens. In fact the title "Rogue Agent" , holds all the films intriguing value. Beyond the title it's a snooze fest disaster of international proportions bordering on intergalactic. Why do I need more characters? I was finished!
Failed communication practices are not funny for extensive periods of time. Communication takes listening and processing. Don't take my word for it ask a professional.
Yes! Theoretically white noise can be funny. But, incoherent ramblings for more than 20 minutes is not entertainment or socially appropriate behavior! Then again , that's my opinion! Perhaps I will ask somebody else! Nope, don't even care!
Need more characters for review standard is the reason I am producing this white noise. Clearly, I was done when stating didn't care. But, somebody wants to have a lengthy unnecessary review. So please except my apology for the white noise written after that conclusive point of this review.
Yes! Theoretically white noise can be funny. But, incoherent ramblings for more than 20 minutes is not entertainment or socially appropriate behavior! Then again , that's my opinion! Perhaps I will ask somebody else! Nope, don't even care!
Need more characters for review standard is the reason I am producing this white noise. Clearly, I was done when stating didn't care. But, somebody wants to have a lengthy unnecessary review. So please except my apology for the white noise written after that conclusive point of this review.
Trying to look past the not funny stereotype of the big black guy sponsor is ruining this for me. What year is it 1963? Perhaps 50s or 70s. Not 2016 in my neighborhood! Guess the writers don't actually know any black people!