mjwwilson
Joined Sep 2012
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews1
mjwwilson's rating
I would rate this show a 9 out of 10. The reason being is not because of the shows contents. Without the nudity, this show would naturally be a 3/10. But because the show is daring and that it exposes how ridiculous censoring nudity is, it deserves a significantly higher rating.
This being said, censoring nudity is a concept in American society that is somewhat of a mystery to us. It actually makes us realize that we actually glorify violence over natural nudity. We are born naked, right? So what can't we show this? Why can we show a person's ass, but not their front? It simply doesn't make sense to me. Am I alone on this? Just today, I was watching a TV show that actually had a censor warning saying that "Indigenous people may be nude" and it was rated TV-PG. Really? Why is this? Ask questions people.... think about this. WHY is it appropriate to show "indigenous" people but not nudity in American culture? Why must we glorify violence? We can show blood people being shot. But we can't show nudity? Why is this?
This being said, censoring nudity is a concept in American society that is somewhat of a mystery to us. It actually makes us realize that we actually glorify violence over natural nudity. We are born naked, right? So what can't we show this? Why can we show a person's ass, but not their front? It simply doesn't make sense to me. Am I alone on this? Just today, I was watching a TV show that actually had a censor warning saying that "Indigenous people may be nude" and it was rated TV-PG. Really? Why is this? Ask questions people.... think about this. WHY is it appropriate to show "indigenous" people but not nudity in American culture? Why must we glorify violence? We can show blood people being shot. But we can't show nudity? Why is this?