Janatay
Joined May 2004
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
Janatay's rating
This is an excellent documentary on Bleeding Kansas.
The great thing about it was that, unlike other documentaries, the people behind it went as far as hiring actors to play out the roles of actual historical figures and everyday men and women of Bleeding Kansas. The actors were very believable in both interviews and in acting out of major events and battles.
I am doing a lot of researching on abolitionist John Brown, and I was a little disappointed with the way 'Bad Blood' creators treated him couple of times.
The narrator introduced John Brown as a man who came to Kansas not to settle, but to fight pro-slavery forces. While it was true, the documentary failed to give the context in which John Brown came to Kansas: his sons came there 6 months before John Brown to claim land and to settle, but they were threatened by pro-slavery forces, so they had to call they father to join and help them.
As for the Pottawatomie killings, the film narrator explains that James Doyle, one of the men that was murdered by Brown, "came to Kansas simply to work his claim and mind his own business." However, James Doyle and his sons were avid members of the pro-slavery Law and Order party, and sat on the grand jury at the court session held by pro-slavery judge Sterling Cato who issued warrants for the arrest of John Brown and the sons. I would hardly call it "minding his own business." Brown's killings are in no way admirable or defensible, but they are explainable in the context of his times.
I feel that most of the film is quite accurate and tries not to be biased, but aforementioned episodes leave a bad aftertaste while watching such a well-researched and well-made documentary.
The great thing about it was that, unlike other documentaries, the people behind it went as far as hiring actors to play out the roles of actual historical figures and everyday men and women of Bleeding Kansas. The actors were very believable in both interviews and in acting out of major events and battles.
I am doing a lot of researching on abolitionist John Brown, and I was a little disappointed with the way 'Bad Blood' creators treated him couple of times.
The narrator introduced John Brown as a man who came to Kansas not to settle, but to fight pro-slavery forces. While it was true, the documentary failed to give the context in which John Brown came to Kansas: his sons came there 6 months before John Brown to claim land and to settle, but they were threatened by pro-slavery forces, so they had to call they father to join and help them.
As for the Pottawatomie killings, the film narrator explains that James Doyle, one of the men that was murdered by Brown, "came to Kansas simply to work his claim and mind his own business." However, James Doyle and his sons were avid members of the pro-slavery Law and Order party, and sat on the grand jury at the court session held by pro-slavery judge Sterling Cato who issued warrants for the arrest of John Brown and the sons. I would hardly call it "minding his own business." Brown's killings are in no way admirable or defensible, but they are explainable in the context of his times.
I feel that most of the film is quite accurate and tries not to be biased, but aforementioned episodes leave a bad aftertaste while watching such a well-researched and well-made documentary.
Overall, the movie is not bad, but, in my opinion, it could have been better.
I don't think that this movie truly exposes the theme of Kazak nomads and their 300-year struggle against Jongar (Oirat) aggressors. I'm quite disappointed here.
But for non-Kazaks, the movie can make a whole different impression. They may like it a lot, because of the 'freshness' of Central-Asian nomadic theme in the international cinema.
Let's wait for the American (international) version of the movie. I believe it will be in some ways different from the Kazak version.
P.S. For those in Kazakstan, I recommend to watch old Kazak-Soviet movies like "Batyr Bayan", "Jawshy" (Gonets), and "Qyz Jibek". These are one of the few movies that truly show the essence of Kazak nomadism and Kazak-Jongar wars.
I don't think that this movie truly exposes the theme of Kazak nomads and their 300-year struggle against Jongar (Oirat) aggressors. I'm quite disappointed here.
But for non-Kazaks, the movie can make a whole different impression. They may like it a lot, because of the 'freshness' of Central-Asian nomadic theme in the international cinema.
Let's wait for the American (international) version of the movie. I believe it will be in some ways different from the Kazak version.
P.S. For those in Kazakstan, I recommend to watch old Kazak-Soviet movies like "Batyr Bayan", "Jawshy" (Gonets), and "Qyz Jibek". These are one of the few movies that truly show the essence of Kazak nomadism and Kazak-Jongar wars.