Kosinus
Joined Feb 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews27
Kosinus's rating
The more you know the less you can enjoy... So let's watch this movie being completely ignoring the past...
We get a great opening, a nice plot, some cool visual, good music, good laughs, a catchy movie from the first to the very last second. Quite entertaining!
My biggest problem with it? The media and marketing! All the trailers I had seen would have prevented me from watching this one. Clips felt boring and forced and cold. Same goes for reviews and interviews... It's like this project was doomed to not stand on its own feet.
In detail: The acting feels often wooden and the timing overstretched. Maybe the director was aiming at the the cast's stand-up qualities? Too much ad lib? The development of the main plot was a little under motivated. Questions like "why?" or "how?" shouldn't be asked. So the final act falls behind its visuals...
Something about taste: All female cast + Kevin... maybe overdone, maybe done just right.
Up until here, the movie could easily deserve a 7/10!
Now let's include our memories of the old ones: Many things and motives are simply similar to the old movies, so you can't help but to get a "been there done that"-feeling... maybe this justifies the tone of the all female cast and "Kevin". Since there are so many things that have to be repeated, why not focus on other aspects of the group dynamics. Accepting this, many of the negative reviews simply fade away as a bare expression of taste mixed with the unwillingness for an open mind. People hate exactly two things: when something changes and when nothing changes at all. ;) All cameos felt just right and I enjoyed them all! Though I cannot help it but to feel that Bill Murray simply hated being involved. Still I loved his part. Paranormal cameos: also nice!
Still one of the better movies I watched this year!
Let's express some hope here: Maybe this was just a story to kick off some franchise so the story and motives will be explained in a sequel... maybe there is a good explanation for Kevin, too? On the other hand: this is the feeling I had after seeing Matrix2 and part 3 didn't do much of the needed connecting or answering...
We get a great opening, a nice plot, some cool visual, good music, good laughs, a catchy movie from the first to the very last second. Quite entertaining!
My biggest problem with it? The media and marketing! All the trailers I had seen would have prevented me from watching this one. Clips felt boring and forced and cold. Same goes for reviews and interviews... It's like this project was doomed to not stand on its own feet.
In detail: The acting feels often wooden and the timing overstretched. Maybe the director was aiming at the the cast's stand-up qualities? Too much ad lib? The development of the main plot was a little under motivated. Questions like "why?" or "how?" shouldn't be asked. So the final act falls behind its visuals...
Something about taste: All female cast + Kevin... maybe overdone, maybe done just right.
Up until here, the movie could easily deserve a 7/10!
Now let's include our memories of the old ones: Many things and motives are simply similar to the old movies, so you can't help but to get a "been there done that"-feeling... maybe this justifies the tone of the all female cast and "Kevin". Since there are so many things that have to be repeated, why not focus on other aspects of the group dynamics. Accepting this, many of the negative reviews simply fade away as a bare expression of taste mixed with the unwillingness for an open mind. People hate exactly two things: when something changes and when nothing changes at all. ;) All cameos felt just right and I enjoyed them all! Though I cannot help it but to feel that Bill Murray simply hated being involved. Still I loved his part. Paranormal cameos: also nice!
Still one of the better movies I watched this year!
Let's express some hope here: Maybe this was just a story to kick off some franchise so the story and motives will be explained in a sequel... maybe there is a good explanation for Kevin, too? On the other hand: this is the feeling I had after seeing Matrix2 and part 3 didn't do much of the needed connecting or answering...
yes, I did enjoy most of this movie. Considering myself as someone who knows the books, backgrounds, chronology etc. by heart I would like to point out, where this movie fails and where not - just imho of course!
pros: - bringing the characters and images to life like this is nothing less but what I would call a great and impressive success! - directing/blending over to the background story works perfectly and is as smooth as it could get! - many references for fans honoring tintin's and Herge'e background. - opening sequence including introduction of Tintin in the beginning works fine! A deep bow for the books and their creator! (though it feels like just another spielberg'esque opening title... don't get me wrong: it worked perfectly! was just nothing new or rare to see...) - references to other books of the series worked just fine withing the situations! - the story preserved and worked on several layers and location together. - The music felt perfect! Original, appropriate and supporting! No annoying pop-songs just to sell soundtracks!
cons: - I still don't see any reason to go for 3D but to make piracy harder to film off the silver screen... it barely adds anything to the movie. It makes everything just darker, which I don't appreciate... Furthermore it seems to make filmmakers go crazy about pointy and flying objects... so far it only worked for me in Tron because it added dimension to the story, literally. - Though the books have their origin in the slapstick comedy in the 1920s it is a little overdone here. But that might be a matter of personal preference. - Haddock is a little to vulgar with his alcohol issues... running on fumes... well... those situations are what I would consider as clearly overstepping the boundaries of the originals... - mixing several stories felt a little bumpy and less thought through... more like a collage with more or less hard edges... - Spielberg... to put this the most respectful and diplomatic way: his way of story telling is absolutely nothing for me! I don't like being told what I see, I don't need characters to think aloud about what is going on... to be fair: he did worse in the past... still: if you need to explain what is going on, if you need off voices or repetition: please consider questioning the approach of directing in first place! - The whole story was cut down to pure adventure and treasure hunt, without leaving room for any deeper connotations...
I was excited when I learned that Moffat would write the script, honestly: I see his work based of the last two seasons of Doctor Who much more skeptical... I was not happy about Spielbergs involvement, though there might not have been any way around him for this project... after Indy and his long time involvement in the making/holding the rights... At least, and last but not least: I believe we all have to thank Peter Jackson for his impact on this work! Visually great and as faithful to the comic books as possible! Sadly Moffat seems not to care about plausibility nor about continuity and Spielberg did not care to fix this...
So it is just like with too many others: watch with your eyes only and skip all other parts of your head. If you are not familiar with Tintin at all: have a great time with a fine piece of movie.
pros: - bringing the characters and images to life like this is nothing less but what I would call a great and impressive success! - directing/blending over to the background story works perfectly and is as smooth as it could get! - many references for fans honoring tintin's and Herge'e background. - opening sequence including introduction of Tintin in the beginning works fine! A deep bow for the books and their creator! (though it feels like just another spielberg'esque opening title... don't get me wrong: it worked perfectly! was just nothing new or rare to see...) - references to other books of the series worked just fine withing the situations! - the story preserved and worked on several layers and location together. - The music felt perfect! Original, appropriate and supporting! No annoying pop-songs just to sell soundtracks!
cons: - I still don't see any reason to go for 3D but to make piracy harder to film off the silver screen... it barely adds anything to the movie. It makes everything just darker, which I don't appreciate... Furthermore it seems to make filmmakers go crazy about pointy and flying objects... so far it only worked for me in Tron because it added dimension to the story, literally. - Though the books have their origin in the slapstick comedy in the 1920s it is a little overdone here. But that might be a matter of personal preference. - Haddock is a little to vulgar with his alcohol issues... running on fumes... well... those situations are what I would consider as clearly overstepping the boundaries of the originals... - mixing several stories felt a little bumpy and less thought through... more like a collage with more or less hard edges... - Spielberg... to put this the most respectful and diplomatic way: his way of story telling is absolutely nothing for me! I don't like being told what I see, I don't need characters to think aloud about what is going on... to be fair: he did worse in the past... still: if you need to explain what is going on, if you need off voices or repetition: please consider questioning the approach of directing in first place! - The whole story was cut down to pure adventure and treasure hunt, without leaving room for any deeper connotations...
I was excited when I learned that Moffat would write the script, honestly: I see his work based of the last two seasons of Doctor Who much more skeptical... I was not happy about Spielbergs involvement, though there might not have been any way around him for this project... after Indy and his long time involvement in the making/holding the rights... At least, and last but not least: I believe we all have to thank Peter Jackson for his impact on this work! Visually great and as faithful to the comic books as possible! Sadly Moffat seems not to care about plausibility nor about continuity and Spielberg did not care to fix this...
So it is just like with too many others: watch with your eyes only and skip all other parts of your head. If you are not familiar with Tintin at all: have a great time with a fine piece of movie.
