editor-92
Joined Dec 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews22
editor-92's rating
Unless you know a lot about Bob Dylan and the context in which he lived - Vietnam War, folk music ... - you will be completely lost while watching this film. I went into it knowing virtually nothing about him, and really learned nothing from watching this. In fact, after about an hour, I think I slipped into unconsciousness a few times, wondering if I had been reborn in one of the 16 hell realms. I went for two reasons - Christian Bale and Cate Blanchett. Bale, at least in the beginning, was really only used in still photographs and Blanchett appeared after about one hour of absolute tedium. Her appearance livened things up, but really what does that mean? It's interesting to read through these reviews, because most of the British posters are in-line with what I'm saying, and the Americans are fawning all over this film. I'm not sure why, but maybe they are die-hard Todd Haynes fans, Bob Dylan fanatics, or being paid by the studio. Had I rented this pretentious piece of crap, I would have switched it off after about 10 minutes, seeing that it was going absolutely nowhere and making no sense. Or I would have looked under the title menu, found the few scenes, starring the actors I was interested in, and then switched it off. If you enjoyed films such as Last Days, another horrible exercise in film-making, then you might love I'm Not Here. I wish I hadn't been there - watching this film.
This film is absolute rubbish. I don't know what "training" this filmmaker had but it couldn't have been much. The camera work was so bad that 75% of the time I had no bloody idea what was going on. The lead actress - who plays an angsty drunken sheriff - looks like the lead singer of the Pussycat Dolls and mistakes scowly for sullen. I'm sure they cast her simply on her looks. The plot is abysmal. An archaeologist awakens some ancient creature that starts killing. Boy, that's original. "Relic" anyone? But this is just dire. The creature is so obviously CGI, and there is no purpose for most of what it does. At some point you might think it would get tired of eating. Ha ha. What told me that the film was beyond repair was when one guy gets shot and in the next scene is running around. Russell Means is in this stinker. Why, Russell, why? Avoid this film or at least bring a pillow to the cinema. It will put you to sleep.