little_maud
Joined Sep 2003
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews4
little_maud's rating
When this show first came onto our screens it stopped my channel surfing straight away. Fantastic kung fu and horror combined with a captivating Anneka Svenska 'Eden'. Anneka drew me into the show like a child to a lolly with her fabulous interpretation of the mystical shlock-horror character. I will miss this show, which kept my interest up for the entire time it was on, with it's mad, fast editing and strange camera angles. The most interesting aspect was the limited time the viewer had to see each clip - it seems that only the best and most dramatic piece was kept in order to draw the viewer in. I preferred the first Eden to the second one, as she seemed a better actress, more captivating and a little bit frightening (in a good way that is) Much that I think the second actress was also good, she was 'conventional' in her approach and didn't bother to take the show as far I feel it should have been taken. Series one has my vote.
I watched Threesome and although a tad on the cheesy side, I found the plots interesting. This must be due to the fact that I am a fan of cheesy american soap operas. I must say I couldn't switch off. Anneka Svenska is beautiful, beholding and cool as writer Helen. I could watch her on TV forever, as she controls the screen when you watch her. Emily is bubbly and over the top - great for this type of programme and I am sure it was purposeful. Taylor or Tyler Dean was stiff as a plank, but that I am sure is due to the fact he is in the presence of 2 stunning actresses.(lol) Anyway, 4 out of 5 for this soap. I would love to see more of it, but because I watched it from a friend's VHS and it has been committed to the history books, that is unlikely.
Bit dissapointed in this show. The run-up to the show made the show out to be better than it was when I tuned in. Boring coverage of average B movies by a loud presenter. Needed more diverse films and more of a critical approach rather than blatant mockery.