surrealkitten
Joined Sep 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews8
surrealkitten's rating
How can a man (Myers) with such insight into the nature of comedy be so completely unfunny? This film goes beyond being offensive to just not being funny. It was a real, palpable agony to watch this, having loved the book as a little girl.
This film is a good, healthy dose of satire in the wrap of a hilariously funny, gruesome B-flick. All burgeoning protestors and liberal-minded buttkickers will enjoy it for its wealth of tongue-in-cheek humor.
Any culture-savvy filmster worth her salt with tell you, if they're boinking on and off screen, the film is likely to be made of the same soft, squishy, unsubstantial material as a big pillow. Fluffy film fare is nothing new from J.Lo or Affleck, but both have been making calculated efforts of late to provide a film for every interest. Indeed, Lopez' entire persona has been of the 'knows where she's going, remembers where she came from' variety, and she aims to be all things to all people (at least, all people with some expendable cash in their pockets). So, film of the year, Gigli is not. The cast looks bewildered, the script is insane, and both leads have gotten so good at faking on-screen chemistry that it's embarrassing. But that's nothing new. The question we should be asking ourselves is not, 'how could they make this THING?!' but, 'why on earth do we keep putting up with it?'