beaver_333
Joined Jul 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
beaver_333's rating
When I saw an IMDb rating of 6.7 I thought that I must be the lone voice of contention when rating this piece of junk movie; however, then I see that the first several pages of reviews all have rating of 1 or 2 - which is justified. Maybe the early reviews were paid for because this is the absolute worst film in this series.
Time is precious and instead of watching this movie you could do something more enjoyable like scrubbing garbage cans, picking up dog poop or flossing your teeth with barb wire.
Time is precious and instead of watching this movie you could do something more enjoyable like scrubbing garbage cans, picking up dog poop or flossing your teeth with barb wire.
I don't spend a lot of time reviewing movies, but when I looked this movie up on IMDb and saw a few 'great reviews' I figured those folks were getting paid, so I wanted to add my thoughts.
My theory is that they made the camera work so bad (the camera is constantly shaking and zooming in and out) the viewer wouldn't notice the terrible character development and lack of plot. Seriously, if you have ever tried to take a photo with a camera while the the zoom/focus constantly is going in and out, then you will have a preview of what it is like trying to watch this piece of junk. Did they give an I-phone to a 2 year old to do the camera work?
As far as the plot, totally predictable and weak as water, and I felt no no connection to the characters.
Bottom line: if you were wanting to present a movie where nothing worked, this would be a superb example.
My theory is that they made the camera work so bad (the camera is constantly shaking and zooming in and out) the viewer wouldn't notice the terrible character development and lack of plot. Seriously, if you have ever tried to take a photo with a camera while the the zoom/focus constantly is going in and out, then you will have a preview of what it is like trying to watch this piece of junk. Did they give an I-phone to a 2 year old to do the camera work?
As far as the plot, totally predictable and weak as water, and I felt no no connection to the characters.
Bottom line: if you were wanting to present a movie where nothing worked, this would be a superb example.
Although it has been said before, this is another great show - intelligently written, with interesting characters, and a wonderful black sense of humour - that people bypassed in favour of the mind-numbing...um stuff... that gets ratings but has little else.
I really hope somebody sees this series for what it was and brings it back from the dead. Barring that, maybe somebody will release the episodes on DVD.
Hello, anyone there? Nah, it looks like everyone is watching reruns of Fear Factor.
Thanks for you time.
I really hope somebody sees this series for what it was and brings it back from the dead. Barring that, maybe somebody will release the episodes on DVD.
Hello, anyone there? Nah, it looks like everyone is watching reruns of Fear Factor.
Thanks for you time.