deager
Joined Jul 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews53
deager's rating
Lifetime/Hallmark has done some stinkers but this has to be the worst yet. ImDB shows they spent $1million to make this. Where? They could not have spent more than $25 for the scrip, which was nothing more than a convoluted mess. Maybe they used AI to write it. The direction was passable, pedestrian at best. The acting was what you would expect from the production company. No stars, no top talent, some that were pretty good, some that seem to have just walked off their local dinner theater stage. But with a script this bad it is hard to tell. Calling it Cinematography is an insult to cinematographers. It was a person behind a camera that knew something about lighting. The house they used probably ate a good bit of the budget, a big, big, & big house. Maybe an AirB&B rented for a couple of days. This is just an awful, awful movie that never tried to more than what was, an awful Lifetime movie. Anyone who rated this higher than a 4 is being paid, is related to someone affiliated with the movie, or has a heart of gold when it comes to movies.
Awful, awful movie. Direction was stiff, scrip was stupid, acting was...awful, except Terrence Howard, he managed to just be semi ok. Alex Baldwin wasn't in it enough to be awful and the other star, who is normally a good actor just chewed up scenery like he was doing impressions George C. Scott. The female lead was adequate and basically just blabbed and showed cleavage. How they got stars of that quality to be in this piece of junk is a question that needs an answer! I loved the end credits there were enough producers and executive producer to do 13 movies much less this sad excuse and waste of human endeavor. Listen to the reviews that give this a 1, they are right. I gave it a 2 only because Terrance Howard is in it and that is worth a 2 even on a bad day.
Lots of people didn't like this because it didn't have enough monster action. I don't remember the first two having a tremendous amount either. However, it I liked this because it told a story, yes it was a plot for those who didn't see it, two people who came together in the most horrendous of times to form a friendship, a bit of humanity under impossible circumstances. They relied on each other, told each others histories in brief, quiet ways, thought of how they could ease the other's fears and pain. Then there was the cat. A character unto himself. Brilliantly played by two cats. I loved the heart this movie, well written by the director who didn't use tricks in telling the story, used what was before him honestly and told a believable tale. Well done all around. Don't pay attention to those that were bored because there was actually a story to this one and not 2 hours a mayhem pretending to be a story.
Recently taken polls
2 total polls taken