MarqKC
Joined Jul 2003
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
MarqKC's rating
The premiere episode of the TV show Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip makes multiple references to Network, 30 years after the release of that remarkably prescient movie. In some respects, it appears that the TV show sort of brings the message of Network full circle, becoming, in effect, the TV spin-off of the movie. It's just wonderfully and oddly ironic that Network is now, in effect, a TV show.
As I watched the TV show, I was reminded of how remarkably true Network was in forecasting the future of television. The TV show, at least the first episode on 9/18/06, paled in comparison to Paddy Chayevsky's brilliant and outrageous script. And the actors . . . well, some of my current favorites are in the TV show (Timothy Busfeld, Judd Hirsch, Bradley Whitford, Matthew Perry and others), but who could ever approach the performances of Faye Dunaway, William Holden and Peter Finch? I'm going to consider the TV show a tribute to the classic -- and Network is a classic, perhaps one of the very best movies ever made.
As I watched the TV show, I was reminded of how remarkably true Network was in forecasting the future of television. The TV show, at least the first episode on 9/18/06, paled in comparison to Paddy Chayevsky's brilliant and outrageous script. And the actors . . . well, some of my current favorites are in the TV show (Timothy Busfeld, Judd Hirsch, Bradley Whitford, Matthew Perry and others), but who could ever approach the performances of Faye Dunaway, William Holden and Peter Finch? I'm going to consider the TV show a tribute to the classic -- and Network is a classic, perhaps one of the very best movies ever made.
I agree with all previous comments about "What's My Line?" (urbane, witty, erudite, sophisticated and intelligent), and I would add this thought: All these appellations are true because this show respected its audience. It did not pander. The panelists were never afraid to use a multisyllabic word. No doubt, some "creative consultant" would stop such behavior today.
Additionally, the show is a time capsule of New York in the '50s. You always knew who was "in town," and often why. Sure, maybe the appearance promoted a Broadway show or a book, but it always seemed more "newsy" than "promotional," unlike today when a talk show host holds up the book or shows an outtake from a movie.
A trivia note: Actress Jayne Meadows appeared as the Mystery Guest on 1 August 1954, the day after her marriage to Steve Allen,who was regular panelist that night. She disguised her voice (as the Mystery Guest often did), prompting Allen to comment that he thought the Mystery Guest might be Minnie Mouse. Panelist Arlene Francis correctly identified Meadows.
Additionally, the show is a time capsule of New York in the '50s. You always knew who was "in town," and often why. Sure, maybe the appearance promoted a Broadway show or a book, but it always seemed more "newsy" than "promotional," unlike today when a talk show host holds up the book or shows an outtake from a movie.
A trivia note: Actress Jayne Meadows appeared as the Mystery Guest on 1 August 1954, the day after her marriage to Steve Allen,who was regular panelist that night. She disguised her voice (as the Mystery Guest often did), prompting Allen to comment that he thought the Mystery Guest might be Minnie Mouse. Panelist Arlene Francis correctly identified Meadows.
The simplicity of the sets in this film are absolutely breathtaking. It is a film that captures the imagination not so much with what it shows as what it doesn't show.
This film is truly a "passion." Maria Falconetti expresses the pain and the anguish of a person who truly is being persecuted. Most of her shots are simply face or head-and-shoulder shots. Perhaps it is a reality of silent films that makes the images all the more compelling. Still, one can't help but wonder whether movies wouldn't be better today if the example set by this film and others like it were not followed.
Maria Falconetti is stunning. One wonders why this extraordinary talent is not more widely known.
This film is truly a "passion." Maria Falconetti expresses the pain and the anguish of a person who truly is being persecuted. Most of her shots are simply face or head-and-shoulder shots. Perhaps it is a reality of silent films that makes the images all the more compelling. Still, one can't help but wonder whether movies wouldn't be better today if the example set by this film and others like it were not followed.
Maria Falconetti is stunning. One wonders why this extraordinary talent is not more widely known.