holysin-1
Joined Oct 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews6
holysin-1's rating
To say this is mediocre does a disservice to medicracy. It's fine, but really the late great George Burns and John Denver did.this story *SO* much better nearly 50 years ago without so much holier than thou sort of writing.again It's fine but isn't really ground breaking in any way. If you're a holy roller this will appeal to you, everyone else (even those of us who loved highway to heaven/touched by an angel style christianity) would be better off giving this a miss. Not entirely sure why IMDB now has a minimum length for reviews, perhaps to insure people don't actually read them all, but for movies like this you get the general gist of the review in the first few sentences. Give this one a miss.
Read the book series a handful of years ago on Kindle unlimited. It was if nothing else mildly entertaining. The TV show is much better than the books. They've changed a rather significant portion of the story generally for the better, but don't look to either the show or the books for serious thought provoking ideas. The groundbreaking bit is that we have a fat vampire. Everything else is as expected. The TV show is a solid 8 out of 10 for what it is due to the quality of the actors. The book series is a middling 5 out of 10 due to the ability of the author to get into a teenager's mind (Reginald is 15 in the books.)