deltaforce7
Joined Sep 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings95
deltaforce7's rating
Reviews39
deltaforce7's rating
I must admit that this movie has some eye candy scenes and exhilarating moments, but this is what kept me from giving it all 10 stars.
1. It is not possible to eject at Mach 10+. Not without being in some sort of a capsule, I guess.
2. How many times would Tom Cruise grab aircrafts and fly them away without permissions?
3. How could Tom Cruise ride his motorcycle into an AF base without even stopping at a check point?
4. Why would you want to use bunches of cruise missiles to bomb runways instead of shooting these same missiles to hit such a tiny target as an air exhaust?
5. A country in possession of Su-57 fighters cannot part ways with S-75 SAMs? Ever since the mid-50s, past century? Where are their radars? Those SAMs don't guide themselves.
6. There is no single attempt to integrate any Wild Weasels to keep the SAMs busy. Why?
7. On the way home, why not drop to the same low altitude to stay away from the SAMs radars (that could not be visually spotted anywhere anyway).
8. How could a radio fuse turn on that F-14's radar screen?
9. Wouldn't the enemy F-14 refuse to fire at its "friendly" Su-57s? Or it instantaneously became US-friendly ones two American pilots crawled into it?
10. How could one defeat radar guided SAMs with flares? Those SAMs cannot even see those flares. It means nothing how many flares they released. Using chaff dispensers or some ECMs would make sense. Heavy maneuvering could help, too.
11. There is NO modification of Mi-24 anywhere that would have TWIN chin turret mounted gatlings. Forget about such configuration not making sense at all.
12. Why that Mi-24 would be trying to kill an already downed pilot, and from a point-blank range? There should've been some special forces chasing him on the ground. And they would not likely want to simply kill that pilot.
13. Two pilots who just ejected at high speeds AND then crash landed into an arrester net (that is not as gentle as cables) couldn't stay all healthy, smily and happy. No.
Plus, I didn't care for the secondary characters who just read their lines with no development or interest building. Absolute static 2D figures.
I couldn't sit through the entire bar sequences, plus the "relationships" scenes. Slow and boring.
An old admiral dies, everyone is happy, everybody is a hero, no one gets fired. THE END.
1. It is not possible to eject at Mach 10+. Not without being in some sort of a capsule, I guess.
2. How many times would Tom Cruise grab aircrafts and fly them away without permissions?
3. How could Tom Cruise ride his motorcycle into an AF base without even stopping at a check point?
4. Why would you want to use bunches of cruise missiles to bomb runways instead of shooting these same missiles to hit such a tiny target as an air exhaust?
5. A country in possession of Su-57 fighters cannot part ways with S-75 SAMs? Ever since the mid-50s, past century? Where are their radars? Those SAMs don't guide themselves.
6. There is no single attempt to integrate any Wild Weasels to keep the SAMs busy. Why?
7. On the way home, why not drop to the same low altitude to stay away from the SAMs radars (that could not be visually spotted anywhere anyway).
8. How could a radio fuse turn on that F-14's radar screen?
9. Wouldn't the enemy F-14 refuse to fire at its "friendly" Su-57s? Or it instantaneously became US-friendly ones two American pilots crawled into it?
10. How could one defeat radar guided SAMs with flares? Those SAMs cannot even see those flares. It means nothing how many flares they released. Using chaff dispensers or some ECMs would make sense. Heavy maneuvering could help, too.
11. There is NO modification of Mi-24 anywhere that would have TWIN chin turret mounted gatlings. Forget about such configuration not making sense at all.
12. Why that Mi-24 would be trying to kill an already downed pilot, and from a point-blank range? There should've been some special forces chasing him on the ground. And they would not likely want to simply kill that pilot.
13. Two pilots who just ejected at high speeds AND then crash landed into an arrester net (that is not as gentle as cables) couldn't stay all healthy, smily and happy. No.
Plus, I didn't care for the secondary characters who just read their lines with no development or interest building. Absolute static 2D figures.
I couldn't sit through the entire bar sequences, plus the "relationships" scenes. Slow and boring.
An old admiral dies, everyone is happy, everybody is a hero, no one gets fired. THE END.
Where to start...
I could not believe my eyes and ears that this is an actual movie and not an overboard, hateful, disgusted parody of some real bad movie!
I mean, for a while my mind flatly refused to accept the inevitable truth that this flick was for real, that this wasn't some sort of handbook on how NOT to make movies.
Seriously, if the makers of this puke had to borrow or steal some old props from a number of rather well known sci-fi movies (such as, obviously, Aliens, Cube and others), then this must've been a poorly made attempt to parody all those B-grade knock-off flicks of many actually popular films.
When you find a number of top-grade actors playing so horribly badly in a movie with SFX not making it to the level of the first silent sci-fi films, with dialogue obviously written by someone suffering from a debilitating mental development issue, with such disregard for any and all basic scientific legitimacy, then it doesn't come easy for you to believe that all this is not a joke.
And what about all the looooong, life-draining dialogue? What's up with light and scenery? Someone tell me, what's up with those CO2 rifles that do not produce recoil, smoke, and spent shells? Them blue CO2 rifles evidently had their ejection port covers closed during shooting.
Zombies? Again? How could someone sane fund another lower-B grade zombie movie???
Also, why would a 'sleeper' star transport ship have such enormously wide corridors, such tall ceilings -- such wasteful abundance of unused life-supporting space?
It is painfully obvious that everyone involved in making of this terrible mistake of a movie has absolutely no scientific knowledge and no common sense. And no movie-making abilities, too.
I recommend everyone with enough patience to attempt watching this movie just in order to adjust your "where is the bottom" mark. You know what I mean.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken