Ian Livingstone
Joined Sep 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews8
Ian Livingstone's rating
First of all, I'd like to state that Ben Affleck, although he tries, is not a very good actor. (With the exception of the dog fight scenes)
On the other hand, Josh Hartnett was very good, although his role wasn't a very good one.
Okay, now for the good and the bad...
THE GOOD:
Very well-done dogfight scenes. Big-budget special effects. One very sad scene that actually made me cry. A famous story told through it's survivors, not through the events. (ala Titanic)
THE BAD:
Altered events to make the story more politically correct. Minor characters that you didn't care about but you were supposed to. Bad editing, some parts too long, others too short. (Poorly used time makes one feel tired towards the last third of the movie) A very cliche ending.
Overall this film was better than I thought it would be (after I read all the negative reviews) but it's basically a somewhat shoddy WW2 Titanic. (If you have seen Titanic, you will most likely make several comparisons)
7.5/10
On the other hand, Josh Hartnett was very good, although his role wasn't a very good one.
Okay, now for the good and the bad...
THE GOOD:
Very well-done dogfight scenes. Big-budget special effects. One very sad scene that actually made me cry. A famous story told through it's survivors, not through the events. (ala Titanic)
THE BAD:
Altered events to make the story more politically correct. Minor characters that you didn't care about but you were supposed to. Bad editing, some parts too long, others too short. (Poorly used time makes one feel tired towards the last third of the movie) A very cliche ending.
Overall this film was better than I thought it would be (after I read all the negative reviews) but it's basically a somewhat shoddy WW2 Titanic. (If you have seen Titanic, you will most likely make several comparisons)
7.5/10
This game was revolutionary when it was released back in '96, and it still is much much deeper than most games released today.
It had unbelievable amount of potential, and it achieved alot of it, but there were some flaws holding it back.
If you can play games that don't have high-resolution, 3d accelerated graphics, then this game is worth trying out just to see how much depth an RPG can hold.
Overall: 9.5/10
It had unbelievable amount of potential, and it achieved alot of it, but there were some flaws holding it back.
If you can play games that don't have high-resolution, 3d accelerated graphics, then this game is worth trying out just to see how much depth an RPG can hold.
Overall: 9.5/10
For people looking for a sequel to Chrono Trigger (Like me), this isn't for you.
The storyline is only barely connected to the first game, and the gameplay is straight from a recent Final Fantasy game.
Although the music was excellent and the graphics were great for a Playstation game, this game was sorely disappointing for me.
Overall: 6/10
The storyline is only barely connected to the first game, and the gameplay is straight from a recent Final Fantasy game.
Although the music was excellent and the graphics were great for a Playstation game, this game was sorely disappointing for me.
Overall: 6/10