xawn
Joined May 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews29
xawn's rating
I would describe this film as awful. The fact that all the film is shot through a camcorder makes one feel he is part of the furniture. The dialogues are somewhat tedious, but thats reality i guess. Possibility more could have been done when it comes to credibility. However, something fresh all the same!
I wouldnt describe this film as awful. The fact that all the film is shot through a camcorder makes one feel he is part of the furniture. The dialogues are somewhat tedious, but thats reality i guess. Possibility more could have been done when it comes to credibility. However, something fresh all the same!
Monday evening is a sacred night for movies. Couple of friends, each get a turn to choose a dvd. I was never a fan of clint eastwood. I see him as a two-dimensional actor, fit only for westerns. And this film confirms it. The plot was decent and kept most of us going till the end (although i guessed who the baddy was from the beginning). The acting was awful and tedious. Even in scenes where most human beings would be sh***ing their pants, our main actor (who had just received a heart transplant two months before) was strolling around as if in a park feeding pigeons. I think i caught him yawning too! Well, most of us where asleep by the end of the film.