kram66
Joined May 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews14
kram66's rating
"America's Psychic Challenge" is a reality TV show that claims to test the abilities of self-proclaimed psychics. However, after watching the show, I found it to be utterly unconvincing and, frankly, a waste of time.
The supposed "psychics" on the show appear to rely entirely on guesswork and vague statements that could apply to almost anyone. Their "predictions" and "readings" are often so general that they could be interpreted to fit a wide range of scenarios. When they do make specific claims, they frequently miss the mark entirely.
In my opinion, "America's Psychic Challenge" does more to disprove the existence of psychic powers than to validate them. The contestants' frequent misses and reliance on cold reading techniques demonstrate that there's no real supernatural ability at play. Instead, the show seems to exploit people's desire to believe in the extraordinary, offering entertainment value at the cost of promoting pseudoscience.
I found "America's Psychic Challenge" to be a disappointing and misleading show that fails to provide any credible evidence for psychic abilities. Viewers would be better served by programs that promote critical thinking and scientific understanding rather than this exercise in wishful thinking.
The supposed "psychics" on the show appear to rely entirely on guesswork and vague statements that could apply to almost anyone. Their "predictions" and "readings" are often so general that they could be interpreted to fit a wide range of scenarios. When they do make specific claims, they frequently miss the mark entirely.
In my opinion, "America's Psychic Challenge" does more to disprove the existence of psychic powers than to validate them. The contestants' frequent misses and reliance on cold reading techniques demonstrate that there's no real supernatural ability at play. Instead, the show seems to exploit people's desire to believe in the extraordinary, offering entertainment value at the cost of promoting pseudoscience.
I found "America's Psychic Challenge" to be a disappointing and misleading show that fails to provide any credible evidence for psychic abilities. Viewers would be better served by programs that promote critical thinking and scientific understanding rather than this exercise in wishful thinking.
"Paranormal Caught on Camera" tries hard to reel you in with its promise of real ghostly footage, but man, does it miss the mark. This show left me rolling my eyes more than covering them in fear.
Let's talk about the elephant in the room - the "evidence." Half the time, I swear I'm watching a first-year film student's CGI homework. The other half? Well, let's just say if ghosts were that camera-hungry, we'd have solved the afterlife mystery ages ago.
And don't get me started on the narration. They hype up every dust particle like it's the ghost of Elvis doing the moonwalk. I get it, they need ratings, but come on! A creaky floorboard doesn't need a dramatic soundtrack and gasping commentary.
Look, if you're after a good laugh or want to play a drinking game (take a shot every time someone says "unexplained phenomenon"), then sure, give it a watch. But if you're hoping for some genuine spooks or credible paranormal investigation? Save yourself the time and go sit in a dark room with a flashlight instead. At least then, the shadows you see might actually be real.
Let's talk about the elephant in the room - the "evidence." Half the time, I swear I'm watching a first-year film student's CGI homework. The other half? Well, let's just say if ghosts were that camera-hungry, we'd have solved the afterlife mystery ages ago.
And don't get me started on the narration. They hype up every dust particle like it's the ghost of Elvis doing the moonwalk. I get it, they need ratings, but come on! A creaky floorboard doesn't need a dramatic soundtrack and gasping commentary.
Look, if you're after a good laugh or want to play a drinking game (take a shot every time someone says "unexplained phenomenon"), then sure, give it a watch. But if you're hoping for some genuine spooks or credible paranormal investigation? Save yourself the time and go sit in a dark room with a flashlight instead. At least then, the shadows you see might actually be real.
Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction stands out in the crowded field of UFO and alien-themed shows by prioritizing rational explanations over sensationalism. Rather than jumping to conclusions about extraterrestrial involvement, the show diligently explores logical and scientific explanations for sightings and phenomena, which likely account for 99% of the cases.
Chrissy's commitment to uncovering the facts is particularly commendable. Her approach brings a refreshing level of skepticism and critical thinking to the series, setting it apart from other shows that often lean towards dramatization and hype. This focus on factual investigation makes Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction a must-watch for anyone interested in a more grounded and realistic exploration of unexplained events.
Chrissy's commitment to uncovering the facts is particularly commendable. Her approach brings a refreshing level of skepticism and critical thinking to the series, setting it apart from other shows that often lean towards dramatization and hype. This focus on factual investigation makes Alien Encounters: Fact or Fiction a must-watch for anyone interested in a more grounded and realistic exploration of unexplained events.
Recently taken polls
2 total polls taken
