klanglotz
Joined Apr 2001
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
klanglotz's rating
First let me say I believe we have been to the moon. However very credible evidence is put forward in this and no good explanations given why untrue. One example was to prove the fire on Apollo 1 was real they set up an experiment with FRAYED WIRES to show how NASA's theory to explain the fire was correct. Why a brand new module would have frayed wires is not explained. Thomas Baron wrote a 500 page report explaining how poorly NASA was fulfilling their contract and gave testimony to Congress. He predicted a fire could happen and it did costing three astronauts their lives. Baron, his wife and child died in a suspicious accident when his car was hit by a train a week later. The train belonged to and was driven by NASA. His 500 page report was then discovered missing. A man that worked with Baron said Baron was a malcontent who brought nothing to the table and was disliked. Fit NASA's story to the hilt. Sadly one of the people involved in this discussion was astronaut Leland Melvin. Instead of praising Baron as a man who was looking out for the astronauts and their families he went along with the narrative NASA fronted every inch of the way. Not worth watching.
I'm 66 and have heard about about the actual Dunkirk throughout my life. I heard nothing but good to excellent reviews and went to see it yesterday with high anticipation. I was 1 of only 3 people in the theater. As I watched I kept waiting for excitement and story to develop. - It never did. Throughout I felt like leaving but kept thinking soon the real entertainment would begin. - It never did. This movie barely resembled anything I ever read or saw concerning the evacuation of Dunkirk. The person I went with gave it a (-2). The movie had confusing characters and scenes. If you want to see a good representation of Dunkirk see "World At War" - episode 4 - ALONE.
This isn't so much a review as a suggestion. The Doctor is trying to stop from regenerating at the end of the episode. I would like to see the Doctor fail and regenerate looking like and being Jon Simm (who plays The Master). I think Jon Simm would have been an excellent choice in the past to have been the next Doctor and now how delicious would that be if the Doctor regenerated and looked just like The Master.