Jxfiles

The History Channel's Thomas Jefferson documentary bills itself as a deep dive into one of America's most complex Founding Fathers. What it delivers, however, is less a biography than a political editorial-an unbalanced, reductionist portrayal that strips Jefferson of his historical context and flattens his legacy into a single, modern grievance.

Let's be clear: the institution of slavery, and Jefferson's participation in it, is a stain on his legacy. No serious historian denies this. But in this documentary, slavery isn't a theme-it's the theme. Every milestone in Jefferson's life, from penning the Declaration of Independence to his presidency, is treated not as a subject worth exploring in its own right but as a stepping stone toward one monotonous conclusion: Jefferson was a hypocrite.

That's not history. That's propaganda.

What's especially frustrating is the documentary's utter lack of curiosity about Jefferson as a man of ideas. You'll search in vain for any serious treatment of his political philosophy, his vision of agrarian democracy, his battles with Hamilton over federal power, his scientific curiosity, or his architectural brilliance. These aren't footnotes in Jefferson's life-they are his life. Yet here, they're brushed aside or cynically reframed as tools of oppression.

The viewer is left with a lopsided caricature: Jefferson the slaveholder, Jefferson the predator, Jefferson the fraud. What you won't see is Jefferson the writer, the inventor, the founder of the University of Virginia, the advocate for religious liberty, or the man whose words ignited revolutions both here and abroad. There is no attempt at balance, no effort to grapple with the contradictions that defined him. Only the blunt cudgel of present-day moral judgment.

The treatment of Sally Hemings in particular exemplifies the documentary's oversimplification. Rather than present the complexity and ongoing scholarly debate surrounding their relationship-issues of consent, power, and agency-the series jumps to modern conclusions without qualification, reducing a deeply nuanced and tragic historical reality to little more than a headline.

This isn't to suggest that we excuse Jefferson's flaws or whitewash the brutality of slavery. But historical documentaries should inform, not indoctrinate. They should ask questions, not dictate answers. They should illuminate the full picture, not crop it into a frame that suits a political agenda.

What we get instead is a low-IQ distillation of a towering historical figure-an absurdly narrow interpretation that assumes viewers can't handle complexity or nuance. If you knew nothing of Jefferson before watching, you'd come away with only a vague sense that he was a bad man who said nice words and didn't mean them. That's not education. That's historical malpractice.

This documentary doesn't just fail to capture Jefferson's essence-it actively erases it. It panders to the worst impulses of modern culture: the desire to judge rather than understand, to condemn rather than contextualize, to flatten rather than explore. It's intellectually lazy and morally self-congratulatory.

There's a real tragedy here. Jefferson, more than perhaps any other Founder, forces us to wrestle with the contradictions at the heart of the American experiment. He was both the author of our most aspirational ideals and a man who failed to live up to them. His life poses hard questions about liberty, equality, and human frailty. But you won't hear those questions in this series-only the answers that fit a preordained script.

If you want to learn about Thomas Jefferson, read a book. Watch Ken Burns. Study the letters, the architecture, the Enlightenment influences. But don't expect the History Channel's version to offer anything more than a shallow morality play dressed up in historical costume.

Jefferson deserves scrutiny. He also deserves depth. This documentary gives him neither.

Legitimately terrifying, enthralling and expertly delivered, Barbarian is one of the best horror movies in recent memory. Set in an Airbnb in a rundown part of Detroit, it's part Silence of the Lambs, Hill Have Eyes, and eerily reminiscent of the X-Files episode "Home". Unlike others in the genre that rely on cheap scares, Barbarian earns them and dares to take risks. No cheap jump scares but ones that are built organically and surprise the viewer. The plot is never fully explained, yet subtly unfolds for the audience-letting us know just enough to be horrified. Its always enjoyable to watch, smartly written, and never loses us for a moment. A must see.

An interesting premise that far outlives itself, Raymond & Ray, is the tale of two brothers grudgingly brought together by their estranged fathers death. Despite two good performances by both McGregor and Hawke, the writing meanders to the point where what starts as an interesting journey discovering evermore interesting aspects of their eccentric father becomes slows to a crawl and de-volves in to a cheapened version of itself-too self satisfied to really develop. What we end up with is something we should have enjoyed more-something of promise that underperforms to the point of boredom. A miss.