[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back

paulmartin177's reviews

by paulmartin177
This page compiles all reviews paulmartin177 has written, sharing their detailed thoughts about movies, TV shows, and more.
5 reviews
John Cusack, Cameron Diaz, and Catherine Keener in Dans la peau de John Malkovich (1999)

Dans la peau de John Malkovich

7.7
8
  • May 17, 2006
  • Malkovich? Malkovich! MALKOVICH? MALKOVICH!

    Nicholas Hope in Bad Boy Bubby (1993)

    Bad Boy Bubby

    7.3
    9
  • May 16, 2006
  • Fab Film Funny!

    Calvaire (2004)

    Calvaire

    6.1
    5
  • May 12, 2006
  • Ordeal or no deal?

    Well, this was a disappointment. Being a fan of strange and offbeat movies I was expecting good things from this, or at the very least something frightening or disturbing (I like being disturbed which makes me...well, disturbed). I saw Tarkovsky's 'Stalker' and Aja's 'Switchblade Romance' recently, two rather different films but both of which nevertheless satisfied my appetite for being taken somewhere alien, scary and new. 'Calvaire' (English title: 'The Ordeal', hence my summary above) however simply tried my patience and left it unrewarded. Sure, it was pretty weird, but in a way it was too deliberately weird; weird for the sake of weirdness alone. Something like 'The League of Gentlemen' is weird but the weirdness has a deeper point: it makes it FUNNY! 'Calvaire', in my humble opinion, is neither particularly scary, funny, unsettling or thought-provoking (unless "What is the point of this film?" is a thought worth provoking), and hardly entertaining at all. On the plus side, and as a way of saying something positive about the film (as all films have at least something good about them): it's quite short...
    Requiem pour un massacre (1985)

    Requiem pour un massacre

    8.3
    10
  • May 11, 2006
  • I saw a film today , oh boy...

    I have a bad habit of reading too many reviews and comments about a film before I've seen it, mainly to get an idea about whether it's going to be worth a couple of hours of my time watching it. As a result, I am often slightly disappointed with much of what I see, as all the hype that I've read about a film kind of blows my expectations out of all proportion. I had a feeling this would be the case with Elem Klimov's 'Come and See', a film I'd read a lot about, particularly here on the IMDb. (Imagine my "excitement" when, having tried to see the film for nearly a year, I discovered it was to be released on DVD a week or two ago from today!) Well, I finally watched the film yesterday and... well, nothing could have prepared me for the sheer intensity and unflinching visceral horror of the atrocities that 'Come and See' invites us to... come and see. (Has anyone commented before on what a clever title that actually is...?) This is one of those films, like, say, 'Requiem For A Dream' or 'The Magdalene Sisters' (both of which, though great films, are simply not in the same league as Klimov's film), that one does not (obviously) so much enjoy as submit oneself to. By the end of such films we are left numbed and shell-shocked, wondering what we are supposed to do with the intense emotions that have been evoked within us. Yes, I felt like the ground had been pulled from beneath me; yes, what I saw in that film made my blood boil, my head hurt and my heart pound; and, yes, it showed me things I'd seen before but to a degree of intensity and detail that I had not experienced before. The point though, I guess, is that the role of cinema (and art in general) is not to offer answers or tell us what to think but to simply show us particular events and characters and allow us to come to our own decisions about what those things 'mean'. I'm rambling now, but I'll simply end by saying that 'Come and See' is, with its outstanding technical and artistic credentials aside, a film whose very title alone demands that it be seen. It is the work of a visionary, a cry of despair from the depths of hell, and an important reminder of humanity's capacity for inhumanity Go and see...
    Withnail et moi (1987)

    Withnail et moi

    7.5
    10
  • Apr 17, 2006
  • Like the finest wines known to humanity, this film gets better with each passing year!

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.