logicproreviews
Joined Aug 2008
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings108
logicproreviews's rating
Reviews65
logicproreviews's rating
Escape from Alcatraz is a film of grim precision and spectral atmosphere - a slow-burn prison thriller that eschews spectacle in favour of silence, subtlety, and the cold inevitability of resistance.
Directed by Don Siegel and starring Clint Eastwood in one of his most disciplined performances, the film retells the real-life 1962 escape of Frank Morris and the Anglin brothers from the infamous island fortress. It is not a tale of derring-do or high-octane chase sequences, but of chisels, spoons, papier-mâché heads and silent calculations made in the dead of night. It is, above all, a film about time - how it crushes the spirit and how some men learn to slip through its cracks.
Alcatraz is shot not as a prison but as a tomb - grey, damp, and unyielding. The walls sweat. The bars rattle like old bones. And at the centre of it all, Eastwood's Frank Morris glides with the ghostly resolve of a man who has already slipped out of the world. His performance is masterfully restrained: stoic, calculating, and almost spectral. He barely speaks, yet commands the screen with every furtive glance and mechanical gesture.
Siegel's direction is equally minimalist. There is no soaring music to underscore the escape, no flashbacks to lost loves or youthful dreams. Instead, the film leans into the methodical - the planning, the discipline, the sound of sandpaper on cell walls. The absence of overt emotion becomes its own kind of tension. When the drama finally crests in the rain-lashed escape sequence, it plays like an anti-climax - not in disappointment, but in philosophical design. This isn't a triumphant breakout. It's a shedding of skin.
Supporting roles add texture. The prison warden, played with icy detachment by Patrick McGoohan, is less a man than an idea: a smirking avatar of the system, more interested in order than outcome. The inmates, from the artist who loses his hands to rot to the gentle but doomed Litmus, feel drawn from a tragic pantheon - not villains, but ghosts who never left the rock.
What's most striking is the film's refusal to moralise. It neither glorifies nor condemns Morris. It simply presents a man faced with a machine and leaves the audience to decide what the escape means. Freedom? Oblivion? The film famously ends with ambiguity, as the men vanish into the mist, their survival unconfirmed, their legacy now legend. In that final moment, Escape from Alcatraz ascends from taut thriller to quiet myth.
In a time when prison dramas often lean on melodrama or violence, this film does something more difficult: it creeps. It seeps in. It unsettles. With its hollow silences and damp stone corridors, it tells a story not of violence, but of erosion - of spirit, of identity, of time itself.
A masterclass in restraint and atmosphere, Escape from Alcatraz is both a gripping procedural and a haunting meditation on confinement - physical and otherwise. Whether or not Morris made it off the island, this film stays with you. Like the rock itself, it doesn't let go.
Directed by Don Siegel and starring Clint Eastwood in one of his most disciplined performances, the film retells the real-life 1962 escape of Frank Morris and the Anglin brothers from the infamous island fortress. It is not a tale of derring-do or high-octane chase sequences, but of chisels, spoons, papier-mâché heads and silent calculations made in the dead of night. It is, above all, a film about time - how it crushes the spirit and how some men learn to slip through its cracks.
Alcatraz is shot not as a prison but as a tomb - grey, damp, and unyielding. The walls sweat. The bars rattle like old bones. And at the centre of it all, Eastwood's Frank Morris glides with the ghostly resolve of a man who has already slipped out of the world. His performance is masterfully restrained: stoic, calculating, and almost spectral. He barely speaks, yet commands the screen with every furtive glance and mechanical gesture.
Siegel's direction is equally minimalist. There is no soaring music to underscore the escape, no flashbacks to lost loves or youthful dreams. Instead, the film leans into the methodical - the planning, the discipline, the sound of sandpaper on cell walls. The absence of overt emotion becomes its own kind of tension. When the drama finally crests in the rain-lashed escape sequence, it plays like an anti-climax - not in disappointment, but in philosophical design. This isn't a triumphant breakout. It's a shedding of skin.
Supporting roles add texture. The prison warden, played with icy detachment by Patrick McGoohan, is less a man than an idea: a smirking avatar of the system, more interested in order than outcome. The inmates, from the artist who loses his hands to rot to the gentle but doomed Litmus, feel drawn from a tragic pantheon - not villains, but ghosts who never left the rock.
What's most striking is the film's refusal to moralise. It neither glorifies nor condemns Morris. It simply presents a man faced with a machine and leaves the audience to decide what the escape means. Freedom? Oblivion? The film famously ends with ambiguity, as the men vanish into the mist, their survival unconfirmed, their legacy now legend. In that final moment, Escape from Alcatraz ascends from taut thriller to quiet myth.
In a time when prison dramas often lean on melodrama or violence, this film does something more difficult: it creeps. It seeps in. It unsettles. With its hollow silences and damp stone corridors, it tells a story not of violence, but of erosion - of spirit, of identity, of time itself.
A masterclass in restraint and atmosphere, Escape from Alcatraz is both a gripping procedural and a haunting meditation on confinement - physical and otherwise. Whether or not Morris made it off the island, this film stays with you. Like the rock itself, it doesn't let go.
Unbelievable. This doesn't even qualify as the worst B-movie fodder you'd find in a bargain basket. How this garbage had a 30 thousand Euro budget is highly questionable.
Dear budding filmmakers, this is how you don't make a feature. Case in point: lousy story, wooden characters, amateurish dialogue. Where was the script supervisor on this? Maybe they called in sick for the entire shoot. Who knows.
Let's not forget the farmers who are suddenly psychotic murderers out of nowhere? Trespass on our land and we'll kill you. Eh, ok. Wish I has such genius ideas.
And what was with the deer heads all of a sudden? Oh, so scary.. deer heads. And the opening shot is cringe. Guy in a mask with antlers. Terrifying stuff. Wish I had such an imagination, really.
Was this actually directed by someone? Or by some people who haven't got a clue about what they are doing?
This is a generic stink bomb, don't waste your time. Doesn't look like it had a general cinema release. No wonder. That 30 thousand should have been put to better use, say a donation to the homeless.
Dear budding filmmakers, this is how you don't make a feature. Case in point: lousy story, wooden characters, amateurish dialogue. Where was the script supervisor on this? Maybe they called in sick for the entire shoot. Who knows.
Let's not forget the farmers who are suddenly psychotic murderers out of nowhere? Trespass on our land and we'll kill you. Eh, ok. Wish I has such genius ideas.
And what was with the deer heads all of a sudden? Oh, so scary.. deer heads. And the opening shot is cringe. Guy in a mask with antlers. Terrifying stuff. Wish I had such an imagination, really.
Was this actually directed by someone? Or by some people who haven't got a clue about what they are doing?
This is a generic stink bomb, don't waste your time. Doesn't look like it had a general cinema release. No wonder. That 30 thousand should have been put to better use, say a donation to the homeless.