kemamusa
Joined Sep 2002
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
kemamusa's rating
I've only watched a couple of reruns of the original Battlestar Galactica series, which I thought was totally ridiculous. So needless to say, I wasn't expecting much when I heard Sci-Fi channel was going to air a mini series.. But after watching it, I'm a believer. I didn't recognize anything from the original series except the names and that's a good thing for casual audiences like me. The cheese factor from the original show is no where to be seen and in my opinion, it's better than most sci-fi shows on TV today. I hope Sci-Fi Channel makes this into a series if they can keep the same level of quality through out.
Even the wonderful little story couldn't save this terrible mess of a film. It's as if the director wanted this film to be a B movie. It's got all the formulaic features of a great straight-to-video B movie: Choppy editing with cheesy music thrown in here and there. Actors sitting in a bright and evenly lit rooms spitting out not-so-clever one liners. And most of all, a street savvy yet sleazy male lead.
I don't understand why the director wanted the main character to be portrayed as a cocky and selfish little bum. He's so unlikable that you never understand why his love interest spend her life away to wait for him.
If I have to come up with one reason to watch this film, I'd say, watch it for Mia Kirshner.
I don't understand why the director wanted the main character to be portrayed as a cocky and selfish little bum. He's so unlikable that you never understand why his love interest spend her life away to wait for him.
If I have to come up with one reason to watch this film, I'd say, watch it for Mia Kirshner.
Hart's War is the kind of war movie you constantly think "Yeah, I could do that. I could've been a hero fighting those Nazis" instead of realizing the horrors of war. I thought that trend ended in the 70's. In this film, the German captors are so liberal in their dealings with the POWs that it looks as if the American soldiers would've been better off in the Nazi POW camps living in the comforts of comfy beds, hot food and slacking off in their compounds rather fighting in the forests of Ardenne watching their toes falling off from frostbite. We all know that Nazi Germany was losing the war by late 1944 and they were in extreme shortage of supplies. In the winter of 1944/45, many of their troops even died of starvation. But according to this film, the POW camps must've been among Nazi Germany's top priority... Seeing that the our heroes are getting by so easily under the "tyranny" of the Nazis, you never feel for the main characters. Rather, you even sympathize with the Germans not being able to control their own prisoners. The American POWs are always complaining to their captors "under the Geneva convention, we have rights for this,.. for that....", etc..
Putting aside the incredible misrepresentation of history, this film also has very slow pace in developing the story that in the end proves to be a lost effort. The great cast and commendable acting by both Bruce Willis and Colin Ferril are the only bright spot for this film.
Putting aside the incredible misrepresentation of history, this film also has very slow pace in developing the story that in the end proves to be a lost effort. The great cast and commendable acting by both Bruce Willis and Colin Ferril are the only bright spot for this film.