Fizgig777
Joined Feb 2008
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings499
Fizgig777's rating
Reviews30
Fizgig777's rating
If you're an animal lover, you will have a very hard time watching some of this.... They focus a lot (too much for me, I had to forward past most of it) on animals killing animals .... It's understood that "everything needs to eat", however, showing the process and torturous death that one animal has to endure to feed another just goes against one of the main reasons behind this type of show : for people to fall in love with the animals and want to conserve them.... Seeing a Killer Whale hunt and kill, particularly a baby whale, in high def detail does the exact opposite for most folks. There is so much beauty in the natural world, there is no reason to be so obsessively focused on showing the cruelty- particularly if you're not going to warn your audience that some of the material you find so fascinating in your scientific detachment is actually quite upsetting.
Also had to fast forward through much of the tech stuff.... Easily half the first episode, for instance, focused on the technology.... Most viewers want to see the amazing underwater "stuff" not listen to you go on and on about the tech. I get it, it's amazing and groundbreaking, but, to focus on it for half the episode frankly gets boring.
Definitely wouldn't want young kids to see this; they'd likely be in tears. Those who can't stomach seeing the cruelty of the natural world, be warned.
Honestly came away from the first episode thinking that scientists and some nature filmmakers just have no heart with the way they talk about and get excited over a living thing getting killed in such horrible drawn out ways.
Worth watching on a platform that allows the viewer to fast forward. Would give 10 stars for the cinematography, 5 stars overall due to how the episodes are put together, and there really should be a disturbing content warning with some of what's presented.
Also had to fast forward through much of the tech stuff.... Easily half the first episode, for instance, focused on the technology.... Most viewers want to see the amazing underwater "stuff" not listen to you go on and on about the tech. I get it, it's amazing and groundbreaking, but, to focus on it for half the episode frankly gets boring.
Definitely wouldn't want young kids to see this; they'd likely be in tears. Those who can't stomach seeing the cruelty of the natural world, be warned.
Honestly came away from the first episode thinking that scientists and some nature filmmakers just have no heart with the way they talk about and get excited over a living thing getting killed in such horrible drawn out ways.
Worth watching on a platform that allows the viewer to fast forward. Would give 10 stars for the cinematography, 5 stars overall due to how the episodes are put together, and there really should be a disturbing content warning with some of what's presented.
The show's premise would be interesting .... But these fools act like they don't want to be doing what they're doing... They overdramatize every silly noise. Assume everything is paranormal, not bothering to use equipment to check that there isn't a real world explanation for what scared them. That's not confronting fear.... Confront fear by trying to find the source of it despite your fear. It's stupid, and completely unbelievable, to run around in the dark in buildings that are hazardous. Either the locations are sanitized and made safe or the whole premise is BS. Doesn't make one bit of sense to not use night vision equipment.
And the Chelsea chick..... Good grief.... Can a person be any more obnoxious? Screaming and crying and wussing out over a "grandma" voice? C'mon.... Even worse is listening to her speak .... Like this, like that... Like, STFU .... As the series goes on she even takes on the same cadence to he speech as the equally obnoxious Z. Bagans.
Show like this would be far more believable if they went in there blind, not knowing the history. You want to chase fear, go in blind. All the preconception and ramping up fear before even walking into a location makes the fools jump at any little sound or movement. I'm sure most of what they supposedly freak out over in the dark could easily be explained had they taken the time to investigate.
Not even doing a sweep for electromagnetic levels --- high levels of which can cause cause and explain much of the BS they supposedly experience. Don't use thermal cameras to check for wildlife --- especially once you've already run into birds, bats, cats. A skeptic would point out that animals wouldn't be found in locations with "paranormal" activity --- they are extremely sensitive and avoid places with "off" energies --- so running across them is more compelling proof that there's nothing unnatural there than anything else.
Many of the locations are places of untold human suffering.... Idiots like these just going there running around for the sake of getting scared is actually incredibly disrespectful and speaks to a complete lack of empathy or care .... They try to fake tears and sadness, but do it so badly, they shouldn't even bother.
Anyone who believes this BS is real should have their heads examined. Or at least think about the fact that they do nothing to rule out natural explanations to anything they supposedly encounter.
C'mon.... They want you to believe they can see shadows in a pitch black room with the naked eye.... LOL ..... Then take pictures and point out any little shadow caused by the flash as proof and then manipulate the photo(s) with software to "prove" it.... Bunch of wusses trying to prove they're not wusses and failing miserably.
And the Chelsea chick..... Good grief.... Can a person be any more obnoxious? Screaming and crying and wussing out over a "grandma" voice? C'mon.... Even worse is listening to her speak .... Like this, like that... Like, STFU .... As the series goes on she even takes on the same cadence to he speech as the equally obnoxious Z. Bagans.
Show like this would be far more believable if they went in there blind, not knowing the history. You want to chase fear, go in blind. All the preconception and ramping up fear before even walking into a location makes the fools jump at any little sound or movement. I'm sure most of what they supposedly freak out over in the dark could easily be explained had they taken the time to investigate.
Not even doing a sweep for electromagnetic levels --- high levels of which can cause cause and explain much of the BS they supposedly experience. Don't use thermal cameras to check for wildlife --- especially once you've already run into birds, bats, cats. A skeptic would point out that animals wouldn't be found in locations with "paranormal" activity --- they are extremely sensitive and avoid places with "off" energies --- so running across them is more compelling proof that there's nothing unnatural there than anything else.
Many of the locations are places of untold human suffering.... Idiots like these just going there running around for the sake of getting scared is actually incredibly disrespectful and speaks to a complete lack of empathy or care .... They try to fake tears and sadness, but do it so badly, they shouldn't even bother.
Anyone who believes this BS is real should have their heads examined. Or at least think about the fact that they do nothing to rule out natural explanations to anything they supposedly encounter.
C'mon.... They want you to believe they can see shadows in a pitch black room with the naked eye.... LOL ..... Then take pictures and point out any little shadow caused by the flash as proof and then manipulate the photo(s) with software to "prove" it.... Bunch of wusses trying to prove they're not wusses and failing miserably.
Should be called ghetto ghost tales..... Terrible show to begin with, but then they add clowns with questionable ghost detecting toys to the mix to run around cracking jokes where jokes of any kind are inappropriate. "Gangsta Boo"? Seriously? Using "'hood" talk when trying to connect with someone who lived in the 1700's? Seriously? Many modern day people would struggle to understand them ..... Using idioms and slang that didn't exist back then is just ignorant.
Their first show was canceled for good reason.... This show didn't make it too far either, for much the same reason. They had to resort to YouTube, apparently....
Three stuck up "brothaz" making a mockery of people's pain resulting from some very tragic events and locations with histories so horrific they should be bulldozed, not opened up for clowns like these to make jokes.
Personality wise, they have their entertaining moments, but, overall, these guys should stick to stand-up ..... And if a guy can barely read, he shouldn't be put on t.v. Reading letters with the reading skill of a below average 10yr. Old.
Don't understand how this show managed to have an above ø rating, TBH. Absolutely ridiculous show.
But, if this kind of show is your thing, look for them on YouTube.
Their first show was canceled for good reason.... This show didn't make it too far either, for much the same reason. They had to resort to YouTube, apparently....
Three stuck up "brothaz" making a mockery of people's pain resulting from some very tragic events and locations with histories so horrific they should be bulldozed, not opened up for clowns like these to make jokes.
Personality wise, they have their entertaining moments, but, overall, these guys should stick to stand-up ..... And if a guy can barely read, he shouldn't be put on t.v. Reading letters with the reading skill of a below average 10yr. Old.
Don't understand how this show managed to have an above ø rating, TBH. Absolutely ridiculous show.
But, if this kind of show is your thing, look for them on YouTube.