dave-847
Joined Jul 2002
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews16
dave-847's rating
Aside from the main character being a younger incarnation of Roy from the original "R. I. P. D." and the overarching theme of the cops vs the "Deados", this shares little with the first move. Different actors, cheezy plot, poorly written script... it just FEELS cheap. It almost feels as if this is the result of an elementary school script writing contest. You can miss seeing chunks of this for a bathroom break, or a run for some snacks, and you'll never know it. It is THAT predictable.
No offense intended to Jeff Donovan (Roy Pulsipher). When you're handed a bucket of icky smelling mud, there's only so much you can do with it.
Stay home. Watch the original R. I. P. D. It's MUCH better, and your brain will thank you for it.
No offense intended to Jeff Donovan (Roy Pulsipher). When you're handed a bucket of icky smelling mud, there's only so much you can do with it.
Stay home. Watch the original R. I. P. D. It's MUCH better, and your brain will thank you for it.
The story of Alexander the Great is fascinating, and, handled by the right Director, should hold your attention.
This, however, is not that production.
It is a plodding, ponderous examination of the progression of Alexander from a spoiled teenager trying to please his father, to an early death after conquering the better part of the known world ... while trying to please his dead father.
The acting is often stilted from all principals, with occasional flashes of the rapid and inspired delivery that served Burton so well in his career. The best acting in the entire film was done by Fredric March. When he and Burton were together you could see the scene working. No long, awkward pauses between dialogue unless the scene called for it. March was Excellent as Philip
The battle scenes are almost comical at times. When Philip is in battle, back to a large rock, with enemy soldiers closing in on him, you can see them holding back, waiting for the rescuing Alexander to swoop in to the rescue his father. Waiting for HIS entrance so he can kill them as the script decrees. It's almost as if the battle scenes were shot by a 2nd or 3rd unit under the direction of an apprenticing Director.
The scenery is great, although Spain isn't a really good substitute for Persia. The sets are grand, and look very real instead of like plaster and cardboard.
The scene of the departing Macedonian fleet is quite impressive, as is the long shot of the Persian army camped the night before The Grand Battle of Issus.
But too often through the production what could be an excellent scene is brought to a screeching halt by, well... bad acting. A better score might have helped. Or rather a more involved score. Long stretches of acting are done with no atmosphere setting background score whatsoever.
A lot of the movie felt more like the Dailys just strung together by a ham fisted editor rather than a finished film after a competent editor was able to tighten up everything.
This was originally supposed to be a 3+ hour movie, complete with an intermission. We should all be thankful that it was cut down to the 2hr, 23 min. film we are discussing. And truthfully, if the editing were tightened up, and the frequent pregnant pauses were excised, the existing film might have come in at slightly over 2 hours instead.
I waited a long time to see this film, having heard that it was pretty good. It was not worthy of the anticipation.
This, however, is not that production.
It is a plodding, ponderous examination of the progression of Alexander from a spoiled teenager trying to please his father, to an early death after conquering the better part of the known world ... while trying to please his dead father.
The acting is often stilted from all principals, with occasional flashes of the rapid and inspired delivery that served Burton so well in his career. The best acting in the entire film was done by Fredric March. When he and Burton were together you could see the scene working. No long, awkward pauses between dialogue unless the scene called for it. March was Excellent as Philip
The battle scenes are almost comical at times. When Philip is in battle, back to a large rock, with enemy soldiers closing in on him, you can see them holding back, waiting for the rescuing Alexander to swoop in to the rescue his father. Waiting for HIS entrance so he can kill them as the script decrees. It's almost as if the battle scenes were shot by a 2nd or 3rd unit under the direction of an apprenticing Director.
The scenery is great, although Spain isn't a really good substitute for Persia. The sets are grand, and look very real instead of like plaster and cardboard.
The scene of the departing Macedonian fleet is quite impressive, as is the long shot of the Persian army camped the night before The Grand Battle of Issus.
But too often through the production what could be an excellent scene is brought to a screeching halt by, well... bad acting. A better score might have helped. Or rather a more involved score. Long stretches of acting are done with no atmosphere setting background score whatsoever.
A lot of the movie felt more like the Dailys just strung together by a ham fisted editor rather than a finished film after a competent editor was able to tighten up everything.
This was originally supposed to be a 3+ hour movie, complete with an intermission. We should all be thankful that it was cut down to the 2hr, 23 min. film we are discussing. And truthfully, if the editing were tightened up, and the frequent pregnant pauses were excised, the existing film might have come in at slightly over 2 hours instead.
I waited a long time to see this film, having heard that it was pretty good. It was not worthy of the anticipation.
Somewhere in this plodding, underdeveloped mish-mash of a movie there is a story worth doing. Sadly, it wasn't done correctly here. You will find yourself wondering why they didn't do "X" or "Y" all the way through it. That is, if you can stay with it long enough. This movie could have been done in half the length of time it took, and the result would have been far superior. Vast chunks of time are wasted on long, lingering shots of ...... nothing important. Or s-l-o-o-o-w pan shots that do nothing to advance the story. The SFX are mediocre, at best. The dialog goes from snappy to dull in the blink of an eye. With a few more bucks in the budget, and a director and cinematographer who actually cared, this could have been a half decent B flick.
Save your precious dollars, and find another flick to watch.
Save your precious dollars, and find another flick to watch.