dexter_greycells
Joined Dec 2007
Welcome to the new profile
We're making some updates, and some features will be temporarily unavailable while we enhance your experience. The previous version will not be accessible after 7/14. Stay tuned for the upcoming relaunch.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings204
dexter_greycells's rating
Reviews21
dexter_greycells's rating
This movie was mostly a waste of time. For a brief moment it gave me a Silver Linings Playbook vibe since the two main characters are dealing with mental health issues. However, the movie does not get serious except for may be the last 10-15 minutes. The comedy comes across as spoofy rather than funny. I was worried if I have let myself into watching a Stanley Kubrick movie whose movies have always left a terrible aftertaste in my mouth. A look at the credits told me it was written, directed and acted by the same guy. Seemed like self-indulgence to me. May be the movie might have appealed to a niche audience at the time it was released but it hasn't aged well. Natalie Portman was a headline name but even she can't save this one.
I found the movie mildly entertaining probably because it is a '93 movie that I am watching in '21. It is also not a movie you take too seriously or apply logic to. The hero (Mike Myers) is over the top whereas everyone else does a decent job. There are some good shots of San Francisco City.
I don't care for classics or cults that I don't understand and this one is right up that list. I find it particularly distasteful when large or key parts of the movie are a dream sequence that that audience was initially fooled into believing as real. The movie builds up reasonably well and then disappoints.