sleemon
Joined May 2002
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews11
sleemon's rating
Obviously, loads of people loved this film, but I wasn't one of them. I'm sure they thought that shooting the film in black and white, in a 4 to 3 aspect ratio, with almost every scene dark and dreary was very arty, but I just found it boring. I'm sure that many viewers found it thrilling to watch Pattinson schlepping coal in a wheelbarrow and then shoveling it into a boiler fascinating, but I found it pointless. I don't think I'm giving anything away by saying that the whole plot could be summed up by saying two unpleasant characters, stranding in a remote and unpleasant place tediously descend into madness. I'm sure that many people found this descent to be fascinating, but I found it totally unconvincing. The Dafoe character spouts long, meaningless sentences in a very high-blown, pseudo-classical style that I'm sure many fans thought 'what an interesting character", but my reaction was "what a load of crap" Maybe the Dafoe character is supposed to symbolize something, but to me he only symbolized a wasted afternoon and $9 down the drain.
I see about a hundred movies a year, and this is the first one I have walked out on in recent memory. Rather than "magical" I found the songs to be mediocre and so repetitive that I wanted to tear my hair out. Singing "A million dreams is all it's gonna take" over and over and over again is no substitute for a plot. I left the second time I saw the same collection of "human oddities" performing what seemed to be the exact same out-of-place modern song and dance routine for the second time in a circus ring, to the delight of an audience dressed in period costume, but rocking out like no 19th century audience ever had.
It's not that I'm not totally averse to modern song and dance in a story that takes place in the 19th century. I enjoyed Moulin Rouge, a movie whose anachronistic music seemed jarring in 2001. But although that movie wasn't exactly "Citizen Kane", at least it had Nicole Kidman to look at.
It may be that I know a bit too much about American history to let all the absurd inaccuracies past. Maybe the audience that loved this movie had no idea that Jenny Lind was an opera singer, not a contestant on "The Voice." Maybe they had no idea that she was a philanthropist who gave away the vast sums she earned to her favorite charities, not a hootchie momma homewrecker. Maybe they have no idea that Barnum lured his "human oddities" to his shows with the promise of steady pay and not human dignity. Or maybe they just have never seen any of the classic movie musicals with songs with witty, memorable lyrics.
It's not that I'm not totally averse to modern song and dance in a story that takes place in the 19th century. I enjoyed Moulin Rouge, a movie whose anachronistic music seemed jarring in 2001. But although that movie wasn't exactly "Citizen Kane", at least it had Nicole Kidman to look at.
It may be that I know a bit too much about American history to let all the absurd inaccuracies past. Maybe the audience that loved this movie had no idea that Jenny Lind was an opera singer, not a contestant on "The Voice." Maybe they had no idea that she was a philanthropist who gave away the vast sums she earned to her favorite charities, not a hootchie momma homewrecker. Maybe they have no idea that Barnum lured his "human oddities" to his shows with the promise of steady pay and not human dignity. Or maybe they just have never seen any of the classic movie musicals with songs with witty, memorable lyrics.