teodoreh
Joined Aug 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings25
teodoreh's rating
Reviews24
teodoreh's rating
I expected another Lanthimos crappy movie, but instead, it was an interesting (poor) thing. The reasons for this change are many:
1. Lanthimos and his writing partner didn't write the scenario. They didn't forced us on a unexplained movie condition like Lobster of Sacred Deer.
2. No more crazy violins, just some camera show offs - better that his last movie.
3. Sureal cities guide the audience on a slightly different than ours, world.
4. So many smart changes. For example, on Frankenstein's monster, Frankenstein is NOT the monster - it's the scientist who created the monster. But on this movie, the creator is like more of monster.
5. So many things that will make you question the morality of our world.
1. Lanthimos and his writing partner didn't write the scenario. They didn't forced us on a unexplained movie condition like Lobster of Sacred Deer.
2. No more crazy violins, just some camera show offs - better that his last movie.
3. Sureal cities guide the audience on a slightly different than ours, world.
4. So many smart changes. For example, on Frankenstein's monster, Frankenstein is NOT the monster - it's the scientist who created the monster. But on this movie, the creator is like more of monster.
5. So many things that will make you question the morality of our world.
