LostSok0523
Joined Jun 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
LostSok0523's rating
This is exactly the type of movie SciFi should be presenting and/or producing. Not a shoe-string budget, but not a student-project level production either; a name actor (even if the name is Hasselhoff), and enough humor/blood/story to keep someone interested when they're not in the mood for Shakespeare.
The talent involved in this movie was B level, top to bottom, but from the director-a longtime camera operator and cinematographer, to the former Baywatch star, it's made by longtime professionals, and the serious attempt at making a quality movie is noticeable.
And the snakes were as cool as you get for this kind of money (at least when they're not on a plane).
I'm looking forward to Anaconda 4!
The talent involved in this movie was B level, top to bottom, but from the director-a longtime camera operator and cinematographer, to the former Baywatch star, it's made by longtime professionals, and the serious attempt at making a quality movie is noticeable.
And the snakes were as cool as you get for this kind of money (at least when they're not on a plane).
I'm looking forward to Anaconda 4!
I didn't expect much, or even ask much, from Sci-Fi Channel movies. And I mostly like them. But the only thing that was worse than the script and acting in this stinker was the effects.
It was nice to see Kelly McGillis again, although her role was so thinly written it was painful to watch. The no-names show why they will almost certainly remain so.
The story, which had potential, was leaden with bland, uninspired dialog, and porno-logic behavior. You simply didn't buy these character, or care what happened to them.
Where's Stephen Baldwin when you need him!?!?
The scenery was nice, though.
It was nice to see Kelly McGillis again, although her role was so thinly written it was painful to watch. The no-names show why they will almost certainly remain so.
The story, which had potential, was leaden with bland, uninspired dialog, and porno-logic behavior. You simply didn't buy these character, or care what happened to them.
Where's Stephen Baldwin when you need him!?!?
The scenery was nice, though.