brentsbulletinboard
Joined Sep 2022
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings484
brentsbulletinboard's rating
Reviews479
brentsbulletinboard's rating
Try as some of us might to keep hard truths permanently buried, those revelations almost always manage to find a way to surface, often in painful ways that can leave us seriously hurt, stunned or embarrassed. What's more, those disclosures often emerge long after the incidents that led to these cover-ups, materializing at a time when we may have thought we were safely in the clear. But, when these secrets at last come out, we may unexpectedly find ourselves devastated beyond belief. And these exposés frequently occur at events like reunions, when entirely new perceptions about us arise in the minds of others, including longtime associates, friends and companions. That's precisely what happens in director Robert Altman's 1982 screen adaptation of the hit Broadway play he staged, the engaging comedy-drama, "Come Back to the 5 & Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean." Set in 1975 in the sleepy small west Texas town of McCarthy, the film tells the engrossing story of a reunion of members of a James Dean fan club held on the 20th anniversary of his tragic death in a car accident. The event is held in the local Woolworth's, a 5 & dine that's seen better days but that was once home for the club's meetings. However, as the reunion unfolds, it becomes more about the club members than the steamy teen idol who provided the focus for this gathering, and it ends up unearthing secrets that his devotees had long hoped to keep quiet about themselves. Their stories are told through a series of dialogues among the club members at the reunion that are intercut with flashbacks to 1955, right before Dean's death. This mix of present and past segments gradually brings to light the truth behind these revelations and how the characters deal with secrets that have remained concealed for 20 years. The flashbacks, ingeniously depicted through images that appear as reflections on a wall of mirrors along one side of the store's interior, metaphorically illustrate how the present is indeed an echo of the past, no matter how uncomfortable that may be for those who view that time of their lives as it's now being faithfully portrayed to them. This includes the recollections of two club members who were employed by the store (Sandy Dennis, Cher), the 5 & dime's holy roller manager (Sudie Bond), two out-of-towners who once belonged to the club and have made the journey back to their hometown (Kathy Bates, Marta Heflin) and a mysterious stranger who seems oddly and inexplicably familiar to everyone (Karen Black), a superb ensemble of performers, all of whom were in the original Broadway production. The result is a highly entertaining, if at times somewhat unsettling, watch that has become one of the filmmaker's best works, an admirable accomplishment for a picture that successfully made the transition from stage to screen without becoming forced, stilted or stagey. It also proves that "the truth will out," no matter how much we might try to hide it - and the consequences that can come from futilely trying to do so. Those who are unfamiliar with Altman's filmography should seriously consider placing this release near the top of your watch list, a picture well worth your time.
An old adage in Hollywood advises against remaking the classics given that, with few exceptions, most fail to live up to the quality of the originals. So it's always a pleasant surprise when a reboot comes along that defies the conventional wisdom. Such is the case with this wild, wacky, sidesplittingly hysterical installment in the "Naked Gun" franchise, the first since the 1994 release of "The Naked Gun 33-1/3: The Final Insult." To call this offering a remake per se isn't entirely accurate; it's more of a continuation of the franchise's mythology, even though it's also an origin story of sorts featuring the start of the legacy of Detective Frank Drebin Jr. (Liam Neeson), son of the late infamously incompetent but always-triumphant Detective Frank Drebin Sr. (Leslie Nielsen). As with this series' prior releases, the story here is basically incidental, serving primarily as a vehicle for carrying the endless stream of hilariously silly bits, sight gags and slapstick humor that have come to characterize the zany nature of these films. Essentially, though, the younger Drebin intrepidly, albeit it ineptly, seeks to solve the mysterious death of an electronics genius in a fatal car crash that's initially chalked up to suicide but that may actually be murder to cover up a bigger and more fiendish plot. Aiding Drebin is his trusty sidekick, Ed Hocken Jr. (Paul Walter Hauser), son of his dad's late wing man, Ed Hocken Sr. (George Kennedy), and the sister of the deceased (Pamela Anderson), a blonde bombshell femme fatale who frequently and brilliantly steals scenes with her unexpected but often-unassuming antics. While most of the gags land solidly and consistently (including some very off-the-wall material), there are a few times when the picture tries a little too hard, but they are far more the exception than the rule. Along the way, the narrative also incorporates nods to an array of other releases, such as the "Mission: Impossible" and "Kingsman" movies, as well as passing homages to its predecessor pictures. At the same time, though, this offering deliberately introduces aspects of the protagonist's character and back story that are all his own, efforts to clearly set it apart from predecessor films. That's smart filmmaking, to be sure: A picture that pays tribute to its heritage while simultaneously establishing its own destiny, a release sure to make series creators Jim Abrahams, David Zucker and Jerry Zucker proud of what their successors have produced. Much of the credit for that goes to writer-director Akiva Schaffer, as well as the undoubtedly influential hand of producer Seth MacFarlane, whose presence here may be somewhat low key but is nevertheless undeniable. Kudos also go out to the fine ensemble, performers who absolutely rose to the occasion when needed, vanquishing the doubt that many may have held about them before the picture's release. In fact, that could be said about "The Naked Gun" as a whole: I'll admit to having my doubts about whether the cast and crew would be able to pull this off, but they did - and skillfully at that. It's a genuine pleasure to once again see a comedy in a theater that actually makes me laugh out loud, something I haven't done to this degree in quite some time. So, to put it modestly, I guess you can probably tell I really liked this one.
Films about dystopian futures are getting more popular these days (are they trying to tell us something?), but they're not all created equal, and this debut feature from writer-director R. T. Thorne is one of those that doesn't quite cut it. The picture's intriguing premise starts off with considerable potential but, regrettably, as it unfolds, it loses traction, meanders, repeats itself, and unsuccessfully tries to fuse changes in tone and direction that don't mesh. In a world ravaged by a deadly fungal pandemic, civil war and famine, humanity's remnants struggle to stay alive, with farmland having become the most precious and priceless commodity. But holding on to this resource has become challenging given the rise of roaming bands of marauders seeking to steal it from its owners at any cost. Such is the experience of the Freemans, a family of African-Americans descended from Civil War survivors who migrated north to Canada after the conflict and settled on a lush parcel of land that has been in their possession for generations. Under present conditions, however, they must fight to retain it, combatting the invasively cunning intruders with same the same forcefulness and guile used by the would-be thieves. Leading these preventive efforts are parents Hailey (Danielle Deadwyler) and Galen (Michael Greyeyes) and their four children. They've trained the youngsters to be diligent and disciplined, which has helped to keep the farm productive and protected. But now, with the growing outside menace threatening them, they must be more vigilant than ever, a challenge considering the growing independence and unreliability of their eldest, Manny (Kataem O'Connor). As he comes of age, Manny has been increasingly looking to find his own path, one that frequently distracts him and doesn't always align with the family's objectives. And, as matters intensify, the Freemans are thus placed in ever greater peril. The depiction of that peril, however, becomes redundant, tedious and dubiously graphic after a time. The narrative also grows somewhat incongruent from the material that launches the film, namely, through the introduction of a far-fetched cannibalism storyline involving characters who more closely resemble zombies than their prototypical flesh-eating counterparts, who usually have the good sense to at least cook their food before consuming it. The film also has some of the worst sound quality I've seen in quite a while, its dialogue often coming across as garbled and barely intelligible (an increasingly annoying quality in many movie releases these days). To its credit, this offering features some gorgeous cinematography, an eclectic soundtrack and score, several engaging and unexpected (but underdeveloped) narrative themes and generally capable performances by the cast (despite not having a better script to work with). Ultimately, though, it's unfortunate that the execution here doesn't match the concept behind the story, coming across like an awkwardly conceived cross between the "Mad Max," "Rambo" and "Walking Dead" franchises. Judicious retooling might have improved the finished product, but, sadly, in its present state, those behind this effort could sadly be said to have bought the farm.