Astenny_Bisto
Joined May 2022
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews5
Astenny_Bisto's rating
Cutting Edge
There's nothing I love more than a documentary that is made in a deadly serious style... only for it to become an unintentional comedy classic due to a cast of the amusingly afflicted.
John's Not Mad would be the most famous example, but my own personal favourite would have to be Elvis in Jarrow.
Loansharks falls into the same category thanks to a duo from the dregs of society who live for bingo and booze. They're a fabulous pair of comical clowns, and it's no surprise to see them drinking in the slophouse in the Glasgow slums known as Baird's Bar, the venue where Celtic Football Club held their press conferences when they wanted to intimidate journalists with awkward questions by surrounding them with a crowd composed of the mentally unstable.
It's a hidden gem, and it deserves greater recognition due to a clash of serious film-maker and lunatic cast that leads to several laugh-out-loud moments.
True, it's not Elvis in Jarrow or John's Not Mad, but it's far better than The Scheme.
John's Not Mad would be the most famous example, but my own personal favourite would have to be Elvis in Jarrow.
Loansharks falls into the same category thanks to a duo from the dregs of society who live for bingo and booze. They're a fabulous pair of comical clowns, and it's no surprise to see them drinking in the slophouse in the Glasgow slums known as Baird's Bar, the venue where Celtic Football Club held their press conferences when they wanted to intimidate journalists with awkward questions by surrounding them with a crowd composed of the mentally unstable.
It's a hidden gem, and it deserves greater recognition due to a clash of serious film-maker and lunatic cast that leads to several laugh-out-loud moments.
True, it's not Elvis in Jarrow or John's Not Mad, but it's far better than The Scheme.
I am very critical of the "Robinson" figure's approach on most occasions. Not all of his concerns are without validity, but there is always an air of sensationalising, lack of sensitivity, disregard for what may follow, and even a cash-grabbing taste to things. I disapprove of it.
However, this is a wonderful piece. Suspicion seems justifiable, so to wipe that from this piece, and this piece only, he had to lay out truth on the BBC show at an inarguable level. He does so.
I suspect that this'll be the only time my hat's off to him, and I'm leaving the review to note what an eye-opener it was.
However, this is a wonderful piece. Suspicion seems justifiable, so to wipe that from this piece, and this piece only, he had to lay out truth on the BBC show at an inarguable level. He does so.
I suspect that this'll be the only time my hat's off to him, and I'm leaving the review to note what an eye-opener it was.
Hadn't heard of this until 18mths ago when it was mentioned on a forum discussion about the legendary HHH.
Not a Carry On/Bless This House fan by any means, so I wasn't sure what to expect... then I seen the names Galton & Simpson stamped on, like a TradeMark of Quality Guarantee.
First series is just perfect, and another example of G&S at their finest and their most prolific. Every bit as clever, expertly detailed, well-timed, well-judged, and well-worth-it as Hancock's Half Hour and Steptoe & Son.
You can sense other characters developing as Series 1 progresses, and the last couple of episodes in particular leave you with the feeling that had it stayed G&S, with SJ and the majority of the supporting cast it really could've developed into something special and a series that would've been as significant in early-mid 60s TV history as HHH was for the mid-50s to the turn of the decade.
I've not done the reading to explain this, and websites don't say why, but it all then changes. Only 3xS02 and 2xS03 episodes survive, and my DVD is missing one but from the four that I have you just know that the writers have changed, and there's also a feeling that the budget was either slashed or Sid stuck it on trap six at Crayford! One thing that stands out is Sydney Tafler being much less effective as the S2/3 sidekick than he was in the S1 role, Sid's heartless, inhumane, and asking-for-it bookie.
But don't say no if you get the chance to see them, because even the post G&S episodes are dozens of times better than the toss that poor Tony ended up churning out on ITV a few years later.
Sid landed a good one, whereas Tony had to deliver quips that made you want to quit, and storylines weaker than a pensioner with brittle bone disease. (ATV Hancock has the wit and charm of a 2022 BBC1 sitcom, written by a woman and starring one person from each legally protected group, where each victim kicks an unemployed native Brit in the painful area!)
So, six classics that deserve a lot more attention than they've had, and four more episodes of an above-average nature.
If you see it reduced on a re-selling site, grab it.
Not a Carry On/Bless This House fan by any means, so I wasn't sure what to expect... then I seen the names Galton & Simpson stamped on, like a TradeMark of Quality Guarantee.
First series is just perfect, and another example of G&S at their finest and their most prolific. Every bit as clever, expertly detailed, well-timed, well-judged, and well-worth-it as Hancock's Half Hour and Steptoe & Son.
You can sense other characters developing as Series 1 progresses, and the last couple of episodes in particular leave you with the feeling that had it stayed G&S, with SJ and the majority of the supporting cast it really could've developed into something special and a series that would've been as significant in early-mid 60s TV history as HHH was for the mid-50s to the turn of the decade.
I've not done the reading to explain this, and websites don't say why, but it all then changes. Only 3xS02 and 2xS03 episodes survive, and my DVD is missing one but from the four that I have you just know that the writers have changed, and there's also a feeling that the budget was either slashed or Sid stuck it on trap six at Crayford! One thing that stands out is Sydney Tafler being much less effective as the S2/3 sidekick than he was in the S1 role, Sid's heartless, inhumane, and asking-for-it bookie.
But don't say no if you get the chance to see them, because even the post G&S episodes are dozens of times better than the toss that poor Tony ended up churning out on ITV a few years later.
Sid landed a good one, whereas Tony had to deliver quips that made you want to quit, and storylines weaker than a pensioner with brittle bone disease. (ATV Hancock has the wit and charm of a 2022 BBC1 sitcom, written by a woman and starring one person from each legally protected group, where each victim kicks an unemployed native Brit in the painful area!)
So, six classics that deserve a lot more attention than they've had, and four more episodes of an above-average nature.
If you see it reduced on a re-selling site, grab it.