prestonnaclk9
Joined Mar 2007
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews4
prestonnaclk9's rating
This film was made with a $50 camcorder and jiggles on purpose. How it gets good ratings on IMDb is beyond belief - the writing and acting is boring. If you can actually view it. Half the time the screen is moving so much it makes you seasick.
The movie is a complete waste of time. If you're going to use your camcorder from 2004 to make a movie do it on a $100,000 budget, not 12 million like this movie did. Absolutely no excuse for how much of a disaster this movie is.
Do not spend money on this movie!
Do not waste your time with this movie and get suckered in by the good reviews like I did.
The movie is a complete waste of time. If you're going to use your camcorder from 2004 to make a movie do it on a $100,000 budget, not 12 million like this movie did. Absolutely no excuse for how much of a disaster this movie is.
Do not spend money on this movie!
Do not waste your time with this movie and get suckered in by the good reviews like I did.
The best part about this movie was the music score. And that was average. The movie reminded me of a snapshot of anyone's life. Why would I want to watch that? It wasn't funny, it wasn't suspenseful, and it wasn't witty. The writing was bland. There was zero plot. One of the characters in the movie mentioned the company was running on fumes. I think the movie itself was running on fumes.
The main character also smokes a lot. I've always found that directors who feel their characters need a "smoke prop" are using it to make up for the lack of something in the movie. In this case the movie lacked an actual plot.
The main character also smokes a lot. I've always found that directors who feel their characters need a "smoke prop" are using it to make up for the lack of something in the movie. In this case the movie lacked an actual plot.