two-ton
Joined May 1999
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews8
two-ton's rating
A real long, dull movie. Don't get me wrong. I like movies that are heavy on the talking and light on the action, but this one really was boring. I never thought nudity could be so boring...but it was. And forget about the two stars. Their performance weren't anything to write home, or here, about. The same goes for the co-stars. Next time I go to a Cruise or Kidman movie, I'll be sure to bring a roll of quarters so I can spend the time playing Pacman in the lobby.
I have to admit I didn't see this movie when it was released. I was a pretty lazy 15 year old. When my wife finally talked me into renting it I couldn't believe how bad it was. A cliche in space, as I call it, was incredibly mediocre. Bad acting, bad script, borrowed story. Oh but the special effects! Sorry kids, effects a movie don't make. I guess there's a lot of 7th graders (or folks remembering how great they thought this flick was when they were in 7th grade) voting on this so-called movie. I took my kids to see The Phantom Menace...at least Star Wars was better than that amazing waste of money.
What a joke of a movie. The writing was especially bad...the acting wasn't much better. I like tearjerkers, but this one had me laughing due to the inane dialogue. What a joke!