Areles
Joined Jul 2000
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges9
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings301
Areles's rating
Reviews12
Areles's rating
Lets just call "Cowgirls vs. Pterodactyls" what it is.
A $3000.00 home movie. Some kids are seriously spoiled!
A woman sees her husband killed by a group of "pteranodons", and unable to get the local Sheriff to help her, goes out on her own to destroy the euphonious beasts. Gathering together a group of misfits, and a female gunslinger, they do battle with the stop-motion creatures. There are faux moments of female empowerment that simply grate in their naivety.
Direction is limited to extended closeup of people mincing and rolling their eyes, performances are less believable than anything Edward D. Wood and Dolores Fuller attempted.
While there are some stop-motion animated creatures, they are less credible than a hand puppet (which is also used). Effects are amateurish, performances are are not even phoned in, and the dialogue is trite and juvenile.
This is simply a very bad film.
But I guess when your goal is to make a bad film, Success is it's own justification. But then, so is navel gazing.
A $3000.00 home movie. Some kids are seriously spoiled!
A woman sees her husband killed by a group of "pteranodons", and unable to get the local Sheriff to help her, goes out on her own to destroy the euphonious beasts. Gathering together a group of misfits, and a female gunslinger, they do battle with the stop-motion creatures. There are faux moments of female empowerment that simply grate in their naivety.
Direction is limited to extended closeup of people mincing and rolling their eyes, performances are less believable than anything Edward D. Wood and Dolores Fuller attempted.
While there are some stop-motion animated creatures, they are less credible than a hand puppet (which is also used). Effects are amateurish, performances are are not even phoned in, and the dialogue is trite and juvenile.
This is simply a very bad film.
But I guess when your goal is to make a bad film, Success is it's own justification. But then, so is navel gazing.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken
