luvdec
Joined Aug 2000
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
luvdec's rating
Though it is fairly obvious that Rex Harrison is the creepy husband, Doris Day looks beautiful and gives the performance of her career. She is just fabulous and should have, at the very least, been nominated for her role as wealthy Kit Preston. Myrna Loy, John Gavin, and even creepy Roddy MacDowall are all superb. I read in her autobiography that she very nearly had a nervous breakdown during filming. Game gal that she is, she went on to make one of her best comedies, "Lover, Come Back" Ah, these were movies. And to think that Oscar went to Liz Taylor in "Butterfield 8", a complete waste of an award and, by Taylor's own admission, total crap. So much for awards.
This is not to say that it is her best film or that it is my favorite Audrey Hepburn film. I think the film is very good, an interesting tale well told and superbly acted. Peppard and Hepburn have wonderful chemistry and the supporting players (Martin Balsam, Patricia Neal, Buddy Ebsen) are all marvelous.
I think it is the ultimate Hepburn film because it is a love story, Hepburn, whose appeal was always more to women than to men, (the ultimate woman's woman) wears fabulous Givenchy dresses and it takes place in the sophisticated Upper East Side of New York of the early '60's. Hepburn has one of her best roles and her execution of the role is first rate. I wonder if she should have won her second Oscar as Holly, but that should have happened two years before, in 1959, for "The Nun's Story." Still, when one thinks Hepburn, one immediately thinks of Holly Golightly and her "mean reds." The film is racy and sexy and I am so happy that it was made in 1961. Think of how explicit it would be if it were made today. A classic, I can see it time and again. Finally, it has, perhaps one of the best, if not the best opening sequences of any film. It's a terrible pun, but "Breakfast at Tiffany's" is a real gem.
I think it is the ultimate Hepburn film because it is a love story, Hepburn, whose appeal was always more to women than to men, (the ultimate woman's woman) wears fabulous Givenchy dresses and it takes place in the sophisticated Upper East Side of New York of the early '60's. Hepburn has one of her best roles and her execution of the role is first rate. I wonder if she should have won her second Oscar as Holly, but that should have happened two years before, in 1959, for "The Nun's Story." Still, when one thinks Hepburn, one immediately thinks of Holly Golightly and her "mean reds." The film is racy and sexy and I am so happy that it was made in 1961. Think of how explicit it would be if it were made today. A classic, I can see it time and again. Finally, it has, perhaps one of the best, if not the best opening sequences of any film. It's a terrible pun, but "Breakfast at Tiffany's" is a real gem.
I love this film because it is so reflective of the mid-50's sensibility and the glamour of New York at that time. All of the actors have wonderful chemistry, and Celeste Holm is a stand out as Sinatra's "fiancee" Debbie Reynolds is adorable as a 22 year old ingenue who wants a career in the theatre, but only for a brief time. She has a plan to get married, have three children and live in Scarsdale, which everyone knows has the best school system in the country. Sinatra and David Wayne are old friends and the married Wayne comes to New York to take a vacation from his wife. He becomes interested in Holm and falls in love with her. Sinatra falls in love with Debbie Reynolds and their scenes are just lovely. Complications ensue, but in the end, it all shakes out. This is one of the best adaptations of a 1950's stage comedy and it is most enjoyable and certainly worthwhile.