strix

This was a excellent documentary in that it provided commentary, opinions and evidence from both sides. If you believe the Menendez Brothers are innocent, this documentary will support your beliefs. If you don't believe their defense, this will support you.

It goes step-by-step for each trial (mostly the first trial) for both the prosecution and the defense. Everyone knows they are guilty of killing their parents, they admitted to it eventually before the trial. The point is, did they deserve the conviction of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder, or, should they have been given a lesser sentence of manslaughter of which they would have been released from prison by now.

Several people against them provide commentary including the prosecutor who is still bitter about the jury in the first trial and considers them idiots, to a crotchety radio host who suggested woman should not be allowed to serve on a jury for a major trial because they are too sensitive.

The people supporting them included Adam Corrolla (a producer of this series), Rosie Odonnel, Mark Geragos and couple jurors from the first trial.

It clearly shows how a lot of evidence, testimony and a theory of defense would not be allowed in the second trial, namely, "imperfect self-defense." The documentary insinuates that Los Angeles DA, Gil Garcetti pushed for a guilty verdict on the second trial, no matter what. With all the evidence and statements that were omitted by the judge on the sexual abuse aspect, he was successful with life sentences for both brothers.

New evidence including a handwritten letter to their cousin and a new victim coming forward that was raped by their father, Jose Menendez, an appeal is in process to get them released.

A very captivating and complete documentary representing each side fairly and sticking to the facts that are known.

I am very happy with this series. It is fast moving and shows a lot of characteristics of each guy. You will actually get to see their personalities cleary as they navigate working with each other and building relationships.

I have to say though I am not a fan of the panel that comments throughout each episode and basically just provides their opinions and gasp at some "events." It is actually quite annoying and think it would be better if they just eliminated that part of the series. They never provide anything the viewer is not already thinking...Reminds me of Gogglebox. Maybe if there was only two of them, it would be more acceptable, but the 5 of them rambling is just too much.

I am interested to see how all the relationships end up. It has to be awkward when you are a really nice person and someone has a romantic interest in you but you have no interest in them or someone you like is real forward and outgoing and you are shy and reserved. But, opposites attract. (Finished S01E06)

I've watched 8 of the 9 episodes and really enjoy it. It brings back many memories not always good memories. Chris DiStefano is really good about tossing in funny opinions and questions about "what were they thinking," then segues it for the guests to provide their input. The guests sometimes leave a lot to be desired, but they kick out a few good comments. The format usually has 3-4 main segments and deal with retro toys, commercials, celebrities, fads, cartoons, clothing and more. Since the show is a Hulu produced series, they are able to give some adult feedback and occasional sexual references, so may not be appropriate for young children. Each episode is 22-27 minutes long so if you don't like it, not a waste of time.