treagan-2
Joined Apr 2000
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews18
treagan-2's rating
It's time to take a balanced view of MILLER'S CROSSING. It is a very good film, with some approaches and scenes touching on genius and pointing ahead to some of the great Coen Brothers work to follow.
However, on its own, it is a well-realized film in most regards. Mode, narration, dialog, performances, music, cinematography, and direction are all first rate. MILLER'S CROSSING finds its own "feel" for its topic, for its times, for its genre, and that is a noteworthy achievement for a movie as dark, uncompromising, and uninspiring as it is.
The movie seems to say we must live within our destinies--efforts to overcome, or, in Tom Reagan's (Gabriel Byrne's) case, straddle between one destiny or another can be fatal. Tom is razor-smart, smart enough to see several moves ahead in the big game of gangster politics, but also smart enough to see the emptiness of it all. He constantly tries to fight off his own sentimentality, and it gets the best of him, as he needs to be smart or sentimental, not both. And that sentimentality proves fatal for some.
What keeps this film short of greatness, in my opinion, is that MILLER'S CROSSING seems to straddle that very line of sentimentality vs. intelligence. In turn, it is a great send-up of gangster pictures, a terrific historical commentary on the ethnic dimension to American gangsters, a wonderful depiction of characters within their era, an existential neo-noir. In the end, however, it seems to fall short of having a lot to say, being content at putting on its show. This makes it, as I said, a very good movie because it has put the show so well.
Highly recommended--but beware of the over-praise. It also drags in spots, and at times its over-the-top satire cuts into its effectiveness as drama, or maybe the other way around. In my mind, FARGO remains the most complete Coen film, in a fine body of unusual and idiosyncratic works.
However, on its own, it is a well-realized film in most regards. Mode, narration, dialog, performances, music, cinematography, and direction are all first rate. MILLER'S CROSSING finds its own "feel" for its topic, for its times, for its genre, and that is a noteworthy achievement for a movie as dark, uncompromising, and uninspiring as it is.
The movie seems to say we must live within our destinies--efforts to overcome, or, in Tom Reagan's (Gabriel Byrne's) case, straddle between one destiny or another can be fatal. Tom is razor-smart, smart enough to see several moves ahead in the big game of gangster politics, but also smart enough to see the emptiness of it all. He constantly tries to fight off his own sentimentality, and it gets the best of him, as he needs to be smart or sentimental, not both. And that sentimentality proves fatal for some.
What keeps this film short of greatness, in my opinion, is that MILLER'S CROSSING seems to straddle that very line of sentimentality vs. intelligence. In turn, it is a great send-up of gangster pictures, a terrific historical commentary on the ethnic dimension to American gangsters, a wonderful depiction of characters within their era, an existential neo-noir. In the end, however, it seems to fall short of having a lot to say, being content at putting on its show. This makes it, as I said, a very good movie because it has put the show so well.
Highly recommended--but beware of the over-praise. It also drags in spots, and at times its over-the-top satire cuts into its effectiveness as drama, or maybe the other way around. In my mind, FARGO remains the most complete Coen film, in a fine body of unusual and idiosyncratic works.
I haven't seen Angi Vera since its initial release, but I have always remembered its honesty and insight into how the institutionalization of ideals ultimately gets corrupted.
Angi Vera, as a promising young woman, gets invited to a Communist training center to undergo the next level of indoctrination into Party life.
She begins to realize how people get ahead in the Party: by saying things they don't mean but think are politically correct; by becoming friends with Party dignitaries, even if you don't like them; by being seen as a dedicated worker (as opposed to actually being a dedicated worker).
I believe this experience has been felt by many, inside and outside politics, or the left, but also in church work, corporations, non-profit organizations, etc. Strong organizations with good leadership build in safeguards for toadyism that gets encouraged by mid-level teachers and managers.
It's interesting this film was made under a Communist regime. I associate it with MAN OF MARBLE and MAN OF IRON, films with a similar themeand an attack on Eastern Block Communist indoctrination and public relations, also made while Communists were still in power.
The film is slow-moving, but very effective and subtle, and feels very authentic.
Angi Vera, as a promising young woman, gets invited to a Communist training center to undergo the next level of indoctrination into Party life.
She begins to realize how people get ahead in the Party: by saying things they don't mean but think are politically correct; by becoming friends with Party dignitaries, even if you don't like them; by being seen as a dedicated worker (as opposed to actually being a dedicated worker).
I believe this experience has been felt by many, inside and outside politics, or the left, but also in church work, corporations, non-profit organizations, etc. Strong organizations with good leadership build in safeguards for toadyism that gets encouraged by mid-level teachers and managers.
It's interesting this film was made under a Communist regime. I associate it with MAN OF MARBLE and MAN OF IRON, films with a similar themeand an attack on Eastern Block Communist indoctrination and public relations, also made while Communists were still in power.
The film is slow-moving, but very effective and subtle, and feels very authentic.