Joel-61
Joined Aug 1999
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews7
Joel-61's rating
Why was this film made? I'm sure the filmmakers, including the writer who brought us the equally dark "Seven", would argue that this is a serious film about the nature of an average man's encounter with absolute evil. They would probably argue the film explores the various faces of evil, from evil for it's own sake (Machine - a torturer in s&m films who finds his true thrill is to cross over into murder), to a mad director who sees his evil as art, to a porn producer and rich man's lawyer whose lust for money allows them to justify anything. And, finally, the rich pillar of the community who commissions a snuff film "because he could".
And let's give the filmmakers the nod that the film is powerfully acted by the entire cast, the directing is brooding and ominous. But ultimately the film fails mightily, as it tries to have it both ways. Condemning pornography, the film is pornographic. Condemning misogeny, the film depicts the most gruesome torture and degradation of women I have ever seen in a film. The film can't have it both ways. It could have conveyed the horrors of its subject with reaction shots by the hero, which it does repeatedly and effectively, without always showing the viewer the gratuitous subject matter itself. It chooses not to, and by so doing winds up in the same gutter it says it condemns. Thirty years ago the film "Judgment at Nuremberg" asked the same questions as this film. It answered them in an uplifting, thought provoking way. "8mm" opts to revel in the very exploitation it would want you to believe it condemns. And for that, it fails.
And let's give the filmmakers the nod that the film is powerfully acted by the entire cast, the directing is brooding and ominous. But ultimately the film fails mightily, as it tries to have it both ways. Condemning pornography, the film is pornographic. Condemning misogeny, the film depicts the most gruesome torture and degradation of women I have ever seen in a film. The film can't have it both ways. It could have conveyed the horrors of its subject with reaction shots by the hero, which it does repeatedly and effectively, without always showing the viewer the gratuitous subject matter itself. It chooses not to, and by so doing winds up in the same gutter it says it condemns. Thirty years ago the film "Judgment at Nuremberg" asked the same questions as this film. It answered them in an uplifting, thought provoking way. "8mm" opts to revel in the very exploitation it would want you to believe it condemns. And for that, it fails.
Take a bunch of over the hill actors who clearly could care less about the their one-dimensional roles. Take a hack script direct from the daily soaps. Oh, yeah, and throw in the most boring natural disaster in history. And you've got this turkey. Hopefully, when the next earthquake hits LA, this film will fall through the cracks.
A film that treats jazz as the star. Wonderful music, with great playing by Harry James. Even the theme of art versus commercialism is handled sensitively. Hoagy Carmichael is great, and Doris Day shows her big band roots with some beautiful numbers. Throw in a totally off-beat, dark performance by Lauren Bacall, and you have a unique film experience. While some might argue with the upbeat ending -- the film is loosely based on the tragic life of Bix Beiderbeck -- I found it to be a moving appreciation of the quest of jazz musicians for truth in music, and the underlying sadness that gives some of the greatest jazz its depth.